Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30565157›Full record

SynthesisDrugs & aging2019

Interventions to Optimise Prescribing in Older People with Dementia: A Systematic Review.

Leila Shafiee Hanjani, Duncan Long, Nancye M Peel, Geeske Peeters, Christopher R Freeman, Ruth E Hubbard

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs & aging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Leila Shafiee HanjaniCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. leila.shafieehanjani@uq.net.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7088-9739
Duncan LongDepartment of Pharmacy, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8237-6586
Nancye M PeelCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3038-8881
Geeske PeetersGlobal Brain Health Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4460-7026
Christopher R FreemanCentre for Optimising Pharmacy Practice-based Excellence in Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6429-0316
Ruth E HubbardCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8688-5836
The University of Queensland · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUTrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults living with dementia may have a higher risk of medication toxicity than those without dementia. Optimising prescribing in this group of people is a critically important yet challenging process.

objectiveOur aim was to systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness of interventions for optimising prescribing in older people with dementia.

methodsThis systematic review searched the Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library electronic databases for studies that evaluated relevant interventions. Experimental, quasi-experimental and observational studies published in English prior to August 2018 were included. Data were synthesised at a narrative level.

resultsThe 18 studies accepted for review included seven randomised, two nonrandomised controlled, five quasi-experimental and four observational studies. Half the studies were conducted in nursing homes and the other half in hospital and community settings. There was great variability in the interventions and outcomes reported and a meta-analysis was not feasible. The three randomised and four nonrandomised studies examining medication appropriateness all reported improvements on at least one measure of the outcome. Six studies reported on interventions that identified and resolved drug-related problems. The results for other outcomes, including the number of medications (10 studies), healthcare utilisation (7 studies), mortality (7 studies), quality of life (3 studies) and falls (3 studies), were mixed and difficult to synthesise because of variability in the study design and measures used.

conclusionEmerging evidence suggests that interventions in older people with dementia may have positive effects on medication appropriateness and resolution of drug-related problems; however, whether optimisation of medication results in clinically meaningful outcomes remains uncertain.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsDementiaDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansMaleObservational Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID30565157
OpenAlexW2904745103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.