ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2019
Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research.
Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
117 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cost per Opioid-Free Year: A Systematic Review and Summary Analysis.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Patient and Patient Group Engagement in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Stakeholder Charter.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Guideline
- Quantitative Evidence Synthesis Methods for the Assessment of the Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences for Clinical and Economic Decision Making: A Review and Taxonomy of Simplifying Assumptions.PharmacoEconomics · 2021Pooled it
- An Evaluation of Clinician and Informatician Perspectives on Medication Harm Risk Prediction Tools for Use in a Tertiary Hospital Setting.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Developing a medical-device formulary for council of health insurance beneficiaries in Saudi Arabia: stakeholder challenges and policy recommendations.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026Article
- Physician Education and Peer Comparisons to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk Among People Living with HIV: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Factor selection in configurational comparative analysis - guidance for implementation researchers.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Interest-Holder Engagement in Health Guideline Development: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.Campbell systematic reviews · 2026Review
- Exploring Stakeholder Involvement in Intervention Implementation Studies: Systematic Evidence Synthesis With an Evidence Gap Map Approach.Evaluation & the health professions · 2026Review
- Perceptions and Experiences of Stakeholders on In-Person and Virtual Visitation in Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study Protocol in China.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Principles and Strategies for Interest-Holder Engagement in Health Guideline Development.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- The Extent and Nature of Lived Experience Engagement in the Development of Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2014-2025: A Scoping Review.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- Implementation Strategies for Strengthening Community and Stakeholder Engagement in Clinical and Translational Pilot Studies.Journal of participatory research methods · 2026Article
- Article
- Stakeholder engagement as a valuable tool to improve the relevance of research regarding framework development.npj veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Citizen science in osteoarthritis research: a scoping review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Introducing a Series of Reviews Assessing Engagement in Evidence Syntheses.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2025Article
- Article
- A systematic review of co-production approaches that involve family members, loved ones, or carers in the development of mental health or substance use resources/interventions.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Review
57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stakeholder engagement is increasingly common in health research, with protocols for engaging multiple stakeholder groups becoming normative in patient-centered outcomes research. Previous work has focused on identifying relevant stakeholder groups with whom to work and on working with stakeholders in evidence implementation. This paper draws on the expertise of a team from four countries-Canada, Australia, the UK, and the USA-to provide researchers with practical guidance for carrying out multi-stakeholder-engaged projects: we present a list of questions to assist in selecting appropriate roles and modes of engagement; we introduce a matrix to help summarize engagement activities; and we provide a list of online resources. This guidance, matrix, and list of resources can assist researchers to consider more systematically which stakeholder groups to involve, in what study roles, and by what modes of engagement. By documenting how stakeholders are paired up with specific roles, the matrix also provides a potential structure for evaluating the impact of stakeholder engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.