ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2019
Nonlinear auditory models yield new insights into representations of vowels.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Timbre Encoding in the Inferior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Investigating Compressive Nonlinearity Using Forward Masking Auditory Brainstem Response in Humans.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of Tone-in-Noise Encoding in the Inferior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Precise spike-timing information in the brainstem is well aligned with the needs of communication and the perception of environmental sounds.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Forward masking in the inferior colliculus: Dynamics of discharge-rate recovery after narrowband noise maskers.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Profile analysis in listeners with normal and elevated audiometric thresholds: Behavioral and modeling results.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Neural Fluctuation Contrast as a Code for Complex Sounds: The Role and Control of Peripheral Nonlinearities.Hearing research · 2024Review
- Dissecting neural computations in the human auditory pathway using deep neural networks for speech.Nature neuroscience · 2023Article
- Representations of fricatives in subcortical model responses: Comparisons with human consonant perception.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on formant-frequency discrimination: Measurements and models.Hearing research · 2023Article
- Incorporating models of subcortical processing improves the ability to predict EEG responses to natural speech.Hearing research · 2023Article
- Neural fluctuation cues for simultaneous notched-noise masking and profile-analysis tasks: Insights from model midbrain responses.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- The Perception of Ramped Pulse Shapes in Cochlear Implant Users.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Studies of vowel systems regularly appeal to the need to understand how the auditory system encodes and processes the information in the acoustic signal. The goal of this study is to present computational models to address this need, and to use the models to illustrate responses to vowels at two levels of the auditory pathway. Many of the models previously used to study auditory representations of speech are based on linear filter banks simulating the tuning of the inner ear. These models do not incorporate key nonlinear response properties of the inner ear that influence responses at conversational-speech sound levels. These nonlinear properties shape neural representations in ways that are important for understanding responses in the central nervous system. The model for auditory-nerve (AN) fibers used here incorporates realistic nonlinear properties associated with the basilar membrane, inner hair cells (IHCs), and the IHC-AN synapse. These nonlinearities set up profiles of f0-related fluctuations that vary in amplitude across the population of frequency-tuned AN fibers. Amplitude fluctuations in AN responses are smallest near formant peaks and largest at frequencies between formants. These f0-related fluctuations strongly excite or suppress neurons in the auditory midbrain, the first level of the auditory pathway where tuning for low-frequency fluctuations in sounds occurs. Formant-related amplitude fluctuations provide representations of the vowel spectrum in discharge rates of midbrain neurons. These representations in the midbrain are robust across a wide range of sound levels, including the entire range of conversational-speech levels, and in the presence of realistic background noise levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.