Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30565068›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019

Periampullary Gangliocytic Paraganglioma.

Ching-Shu Chiang, Bor-Uei Shyr, Shih-Chin Chen, Yi-Ming Shyr, Shin-E Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Overview of Nonmalignant Ampulla of Vater Neoplasms].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Benign and non-neoplastic tumours of the duodenum.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ching-Shu ChiangDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, 201 Section 2 Shipai Road, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
Bor-Uei ShyrDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, 201 Section 2 Shipai Road, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
Shih-Chin ChenDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, 201 Section 2 Shipai Road, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
Yi-Ming ShyrDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, 201 Section 2 Shipai Road, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
Shin-E WangDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, 201 Section 2 Shipai Road, Taipei, 112, Taiwan. sewang0408@gmail.com.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGangliocytic paraganglioma (GP) is rare and difficult to be differentiated from other periampullary neoplasms. The clinical characteristics and optimal treatment of periampullary GPs have not been clarified.

methodsThe data pool for the analysis comprised of cases of periampullary GP encountered in our institution and sporadic cases reported in the English literature.

resultsA total of 117 cases with periampullary GP were studied, including 2 from our institute, and among them, duodenal GP was the most common (53.0%). GP size ranged from 0.7 to 19.0 cm, with a median of 2.2 cm. The most common presenting symptom for overall periampullary GPs was epigastric pain in 49.5% cases, followed by gastrointestinal bleeding in 35.4% cases. Most (84.1%) of the periampullary GPs were benign, whereas 15.9% were malignant. Metastasis was noted in 26.3% of periampullary GPs, with 14.5% showing lymph node metastasis and 1.8% showing liver metastasis. Of the periampullary GP cases included, 30.1% were treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy, 40.6% with local excision, and 17.7% with endoscopic resection.

conclusionsPeriampullary GP should be considered as a tumor with malignant potential. Endoscopic resection is the treatment of choice for most of the duodenal GPs, whereas pancreaticoduodenectomy is recommended for GPs with possible malignancy, such as large size, with submucosal invasion, or pancreatic GP.

Indexed as

Ampulla of VaterEndoscopy, Digestive SystemPancreaticoduodenectomyAbdominal PainAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDuodenal NeoplasmsFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsGangliocytic paragangliomaGastrointestinal bleedingPeriampullary

Identifiers

PMID30565068
OpenAlexW2903799241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.