Hybrid imaging and publishing.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Promises and pitfalls of relying on angiography-derived indexes to identify myocardial ischemia: A tale of Romulus and Remus.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
   Article
2. Comparative analysis between myocardial perfusion reserve and maximal ischemia score at single photon emission computed tomography with new-generation cadmium-zinc-telluride cameras.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
   Observational

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Hybrid anatomo-functional imaging of coronary artery disease: Beneficial irrespective of its core components.2019

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as