Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30565026›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2019

Small Animal Multivariate Brain Analysis (SAMBA) - a High Throughput Pipeline with a Validation Framework.

Robert J Anderson, James J Cook, Natalie Delpratt, John C Nouls, Bin Gu, James O McNamara, Brian B Avants, G Allan Johnson, Alexandra Badea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robert J AndersonCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
James J CookCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Natalie DelprattCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
John C NoulsCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Bin GuDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
James O McNamaraDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Brian B AvantsBiogen, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
G Allan JohnsonCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Alexandra BadeaCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. alexandra.badea@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6621-4560

Funding

INTEGRATED CENTER FOR IN VIVO MICROSCOPYP41EB015897 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2017
$7.4M
Sex and APOE genotype interact to alter immune regulated metabolism in ADRF1AG057895 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BADEA, ALEXANDRA, COLTON, CAROL ANNE · 2019 to 2019
$5.8M
Brain networks in mouse models of agingR01AG066184 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BADEA, ALEXANDRA · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Sex and APOE genotype interact to alter immune regulated metabolism in ADR56AG057895 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BADEA, ALEXANDRA, COLTON, CAROL ANNE · 2017 to 2017
$1.1M
Quantitative MR Microscopy of Phenotypic Biomarkers in Alzheimer's DiseaseK01AG041211 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BADEA, ALEXANDRA · 2014 to 2018
$642k
Agilent Direct Drive 9.4T MRS/MRI ConsoleS10OD010683 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2012
$597k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG041211NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066184NIA NIH HHS R56 AG057895NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015897NIH HHS S10 OD010683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While many neuroscience questions aim to understand the human brain, much current knowledge has been gained using animal models, which replicate genetic, structural, and connectivity aspects of the human brain. While voxel-based analysis (VBA) of preclinical magnetic resonance images is widely-used, a thorough examination of the statistical robustness, stability, and error rates is hindered by high computational demands of processing large arrays, and the many parameters involved therein. Thus, workflows are often based on intuition or experience, while preclinical validation studies remain scarce. To increase throughput and reproducibility of quantitative small animal brain studies, we have developed a publicly shared, high throughput VBA pipeline in a high-performance computing environment, called SAMBA. The increased computational efficiency allowed large multidimensional arrays to be processed in 1-3 days-a task that previously took ~1 month. To quantify the variability and reliability of preclinical VBA in rodent models, we propose a validation framework consisting of morphological phantoms, and four metrics. This addresses several sources that impact VBA results, including registration and template construction strategies. We have used this framework to inform the VBA workflow parameters in a VBA study for a mouse model of epilepsy. We also present initial efforts towards standardizing small animal neuroimaging data in a similar fashion with human neuroimaging. We conclude that verifying the accuracy of VBA merits attention, and should be the focus of a broader effort within the community. The proposed framework promotes consistent quality assurance of VBA in preclinical neuroimaging, thus facilitating the creation and communication of robust results.

Indexed as

BrainAnimalsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceMultivariate AnalysisNeuroimagingReproducibility of ResultsMR-DTIParallel computingPipelineSimulated atrophyValidation methodsVoxel-based analysis

Identifiers

PMID30565026
PMCPMC6584586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.