Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564976›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019

Comparison of the different imaging time points in delayed phase cardiac CT for myocardial scar assessment and extracellular volume fraction estimation in patients with old myocardial infarction.

Ahmed Hamdy, Kakuya Kitagawa, Yoshitaka Goto, Akimasa Yamada, Satoshi Nakamura, Masafumi Takafuji, Naoki Nagasawa, Hajime Sakuma

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Extracellular volume fraction by cardiac computed tomography (ECVEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Advanced myocardial characterization and function with cardiac CT.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Myocardial extracellular volume measurement using cardiac computed tomography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed HamdyMie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Kakuya KitagawaMie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan. kakuya@clin.medic.mie-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4402-6846
Yoshitaka GotoMie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Akimasa YamadaMie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Satoshi NakamuraMie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Masafumi TakafujiMie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Naoki NagasawaMie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Hajime SakumaMie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Mie University Hospital · JPMie University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delayed enhancement cardiac CT is a potential tool for myocardial viability assessment and is essential for extracellular volume fraction (ECV) estimation with CT. The objective of this study is to determine the optimal delay time for acquisition of delayed CT scans. Thirty-five patients with enhancement pattern typical of previous myocardial infarction on delayed CT and 17 control subjects comprised the study population. Delayed scans were acquired at 3, 5 and 7 min after contrast material injection. Image quality and estimated ECV were compared among the three time points. Delayed CT at 5 min showed the highest signal-to-noise ratio of 15.2 ± 1.0 [p < 0.0001; vs. 3 min (13.6 ± 1.0), p = 0.0015; vs. 7 min (14.9 ± 1.0)]. Contrast-to-noise ratio of infarcted and remote myocardium was highest at 7 min (6.4 ± 2.5), but was not significantly different from 5 min (6.1 ± 2.2, p = 0.08). The ECV values were constant over the three time points, although, in segments containing infarcted myocardium, trend of lower values was noted at 3 min compared to 5 and 7 min. ECV values at 5 min was 27.1% ± 2.1% in control subjects, 27.2% ± 3.0% in remote segments of patients with infarction, and 39.6% ± 5.3% in segments containing infarcted myocardium. Myocardial scars are equally best visualized with delay time of 5 and 7 min post contrast administration. No significant difference was observed in ECV of healthy myocardium or focal scars among delay time of 3, 5, and 7 min. Delay time of 5 min after contrast injection may be recommended for CT delayed enhancement imaging.

Indexed as

AgedCase-Control StudiesCicatrixContrast MediaFemaleHumansIopamidolMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumPredictive Value of TestsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTime FactorsTissue SurvivalTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaIopamidolCardiovascular diseaseDiagnostic cardiac imagingExtracellular volume fractionMyocardial infarctionMyocardial viability assessmentX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID30564976
OpenAlexW2905212848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.