ArticleClinical rheumatology2019
Interobserver agreement using Schlapbach graded scale for diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH): can we reduce the cut-off point of vertebral affection?
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Early stages of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) and chronic inflammation: the Camargo Cohort Study.Clinical rheumatology · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Resnick-Niwayama criteria for diagnosing DISH depict an advanced stage, and a new reduced cut-off point with three contiguous vertebrae affected (two bone bridges) has been proposed. The aim has been to know the interobserver agreement by using a graded scale of DISH in which grade II matches with the new proposed cut-off point and grade III matches with the first criterion of Resnick-Niwayama. Males ≥ 50 years and postmenopausal women included in a population-based prospective study (the Camargo Cohort) were analyzed. Sample size was obtained according to an expected kappa of 0.95 and an accuracy of ± 8%. Three physicians applied independently Schlapbach graded scale (ranged from grade 0, no ossification, to grade III, ≥ 3 consecutive bone bridges) on the lateral radiographs of thoracic and lumbar spine of participants. We calculated inter- and intra-observer agreement and correlation. One hundred and fifty eight radiographs (79 patients, 68 ± 9 years) were assessed. Kappa values (95% confidence interval) for grades 0, I, II, and III were 0.63 (0.50-0.77), 0.49 (0.37-0.62), 0.32 (0.17-0.47), and 0.69 (0.60-0.77), respectively. Weighted kappa for the three pairs of raters were 0.87 (0.82-0.93), 0.84 (0.77-0.91), and 0.81 (0.72-0.90). Grade III was the image that generated greater agreement, while a significant decrease was noted in grade II, the new proposed criterion. The simultaneous presence of an incomplete DISH and osteoarthritis, in a thoracic spinal segment with peculiar anatomical characteristics (reduced disk spaces, kyphotic curve), is thought to be a major cause of variability in the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.