Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564779›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2018

Clinically indicated electrical stimulation strategies to treat patients with medically refractory epilepsy.

Ali Izadi, Katelynn Ondek, Amber Schedlbauer, Inna Keselman, Kiarash Shahlaie, Gene Gurkoff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ali IzadiDepartment of Neurological Surgery University of California Davis California, U.S.A.
Katelynn OndekDepartment of Neurological Surgery University of California Davis California, U.S.A.
Amber SchedlbauerDepartment of Neurological Surgery University of California Davis California, U.S.A.
Inna KeselmanDepartment of Neurological Surgery University of California Davis California, U.S.A.
Kiarash ShahlaieDepartment of Neurological Surgery University of California Davis California, U.S.A.
Gene GurkoffDepartment of Neurological Surgery University of California Davis California, U.S.A.
Neurological Surgery · US

Funding

Learning, Memory, and Plasticity (LaMP) Training ProgramT32MH112507 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Karen Zito · 2017 to 2026
$2.4M
Restoring functional connectivity following TBIR01NS084026 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GURKOFF, GENE GABRIEL · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
Year-Long Exposure to Advanced Research (YEAR) Program for Vet StudentsT32OD010931 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI RAYBOULD, HELEN E · 2012 to 2018
$752k
NIH HHS T32 OD010931NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH112507NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal epilepsies represent approximately half of all diagnoses, and more than one-third of these patients are refractory to pharmacologic treatment. Although resection can result in seizure freedom, many patients do not meet surgical criteria, as seizures may be multifocal in origin or have a focus in an eloquent region of the brain. For these individuals, several U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved electrical stimulation paradigms serve as alternative options, including vagus nerve stimulation, responsive neurostimulation, and stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus. All of these are safe, flexible, and lead to progressive seizure control over time when used as an adjunctive therapy to antiepileptic drugs. Focal epilepsies frequently involve significant comorbidities such as cognitive decline. Similar to antiepilepsy medications and surgical resection, current stimulation targets and parameters have yet to address cognitive impairments directly, with patients reporting persistent comorbidities associated with focal epilepsy despite a significant reduction in the number of their seizures. Although low-frequency theta oscillations of the septohippocampal network are critical for modulating cellular activity and, in turn, cognitive processing, the coordination of neural excitability is also imperative for preventing seizures. In this review, we summarize current FDA-approved electrical stimulation paradigms and propose that theta oscillations of the medial septal nucleus represent a novel neuromodulation target for concurrent seizure reduction and cognitive improvement in epilepsy. Ultimately, further advancements in clinical neurostimulation strategies will allow for the efficient treatment of both seizures and comorbidities, thereby improving overall quality of life for patients with epilepsy.

Indexed as

Deep brain stimulationElectrical stimulationEpilepsyMedial septal nucleusTheta oscillations

Identifiers

PMID30564779
PMCPMC6293066
OpenAlexW2901480491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.