Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564746›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2018

Multiple animal positioning system shows that socially-reared mice influence the social proximity of isolation-reared cagemates.

Nozomi Endo, Waka Ujita, Masaya Fujiwara, Hideaki Miyauchi, Hiroyuki Mishima, Yusuke Makino, Lisa Hashimoto, Hiroshi Oyama, Manabu Makinodan, Mayumi Nishi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Marker-less tracking system for multiple mice using Mask R-CNN.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nozomi Endo *1Laboratory of Environmental Health Sciences, Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-0033 Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6626-5886
Waka Ujita *1Laboratory of Environmental Health Sciences, Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-0033 Japan.
Masaya Fujiwara3Research Institute for Environmental Medical Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, 359-1192 Japan.
Hideaki Miyauchi3Research Institute for Environmental Medical Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, 359-1192 Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6393-9830
Hiroyuki Mishima3Research Institute for Environmental Medical Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, 359-1192 Japan.
Yusuke Makino2Laboratory for Systems Neurosciences and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, 359-1192 Japan.
Lisa Hashimoto2Laboratory for Systems Neurosciences and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, 359-1192 Japan.
Hiroshi Oyama5Department of Clinical Information Engineering, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo 113-0033 Japan.
Manabu Makinodan8Department of Psychiatry, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, 634-8521 Japan.
Mayumi Nishi4Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, 634-8521 Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7108-9901
Chiharu Tohyama1Laboratory of Environmental Health Sciences, Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-0033 Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1061-6872
Masaki Kakeyama1Laboratory of Environmental Health Sciences, Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-0033 Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9063-9673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social relationships are a key determinant of social behaviour, and disruption of social behaviour is a major symptom of several psychiatric disorders. However, few studies have analysed social relationships among multiple individuals in a group or how social relationships within a group influence the behaviour of members with impaired socialisation. Here, we developed a video-analysis-based system, the Multiple-Animal Positioning System (MAPS), to automatically and separately analyse the social behaviour of multiple individuals in group housing. Using MAPS, we show that social isolation of male mice during adolescence leads to impaired social proximity in adulthood. The phenotype of these socially isolated mice was partially rescued by cohabitation with group-housed (socially-reared) mice, indicating that both individual behavioural traits and those of cagemates influence social proximity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that low reactive behaviour of other cagemates also influence individual social proximity in male mice.

Identifiers

PMID30564746
PMCPMC6290015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.