Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564695›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2018

Withdrawal of unnecessary antidepressant medication: a randomised controlled trial in primary care.

Rhona Eveleigh, Esther Muskens, Peter Lucassen, Peter Verhaak, Jan Spijker, Chris van Weel, Richard Oude Voshaar, Anne Speckens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Long-term antidepressant use in general practice: a qualitative study of GPs' views on discontinuation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Antidepressant withdrawal - the tide is finally turning.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rhona EveleighNursing Home Physician, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Esther MuskensPsychologist, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter LucassenGP, Senior Researcher, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter VerhaakProfessor of Primary Care, Department of Primary Care, University Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan SpijkerProfessor of Psychiatry, Center of Depression Expertise, Pro Persona, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Chris van WeelEmeritus Professor of Primary Care, Department Health Services Research and Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Richard Oude VoshaarProfessor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anne SpeckensProfessor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntidepressant use has increased exponentially in recent decades, mostly due to long continuation.

aimTo assess the effectiveness of a tailored recommendation to withdraw antidepressant treatment. DESIGN &

settingRandomised controlled trial in primary care (PANDA study) in the Netherlands.

methodLong-term antidepressant users (≥9 months) were selected from GPs prescription databases. Patients were diagnosed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Long-term users without indication for maintenance treatment (overtreatment) were selected. The intervention consisted of disclosure of the current psychiatric diagnosis combined with a tailored treatment recommendation. Patients were followed for 12 months.

resultsThe study included 146 participants from 45 family practices. Of the 70 patients in the intervention group, 34 (49%) did not comply with the advice to stop their antidepressant medication. Of the 36 (51%) patients who agreed to try, only 4 (6%) succeeded. These figures were consistent with the control group, where 6 (8%) of the 76 patients discontinued antidepressant use successfully. Patients who were recommended to discontinue their antidepressant medication reported a higher relapse rate than the control group (26% versus 13%,

conclusionChanging inappropriate long-term antidepressant use is difficult.

Indexed as

antidepressant agentsanxiety disorderdepressive disordergeneral practiceinappropriate prescribingprimary care

Identifiers

PMID30564695
PMCPMC6181099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.