Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564673›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2017

Multimorbidity, disadvantage, and patient engagement within a specialist homeless health service in the UK: an in-depth study of general practice data.

Anton B Queen, Richard Lowrie, Janice Richardson, Andrea E Williamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Treatment burden for people experiencing homelessness with a recent non-fatal overdose: a questionnaire study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Improving access to general practice for and with people with severe and multiple disadvantage: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anton B QueenMedical Student, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Richard LowrieLead Pharmacist Research and Development, Pharmacy and Prescribing Support Unit, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Janice RichardsonResearch Manager, Pharmacy and Prescribing Support Unit, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Andrea E WilliamsonClinical Senior University Teacher, General Practice and Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a paucity of current health data regarding users of a specialist homeless health service in the UK.

aimTo describe the health of users of a specialist homeless health service by assessing levels of multimorbidity, social exclusion - by measuring severe and multiple disadvantage (SMD) - and patient engagement with health care. DESIGN &

settingAnalysis of patient-level data from computerised records of patients registered with a specialist homeless health service in Glasgow, Scotland.

methodData for 133 patients were extracted using a data extraction form. Multimorbidity and SMD were described using categorisation adapted from previous literature in this field. Stepwise regression analysis was carried out to assess the relationship between domains of SMD experienced and the number of long-term conditions (LTCs) a patient had.

resultsThe average age of patients in the cohort was 42.8 years, however levels of multimorbidity were comparable to those aged ≥85 years in the general population. The average number of LTCs was 2.8 per patient, with 60.9% of patients having both mental and physical comorbidity. SMD was categorised into three domains: homelessness; substance misuse; and previous imprisonment. More than 90.0% of patients experienced ≥2 domains of SMD, and SMD experiences were associated with multimorbidity: as domains of SMD experiences increased, so did the number of LTCs a patient was recorded as having.

conclusionThis cohort of patients has a complex burden of health and social care needs, which may act as barriers in the provision of effective health care.

Indexed as

chronic diseasedelivery of healthcarehomeless personsvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID30564673
PMCPMC6262212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.