Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564656›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2017

What triggers healthcare-seeking behaviour when experiencing a symptom? Results from a population-based survey.

Sandra Elnegaard, Anette Fischer Pedersen, Rikke Sand Andersen, René de-Pont Christensen, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Healthcare seeking - who, when and why?Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Health Care Transitions Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Factors influencing symptom appraisal and help-seeking of older adults with possible cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandra ElnegaardPhD Student, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Anette Fischer PedersenAssociate Professor, MSc, Research Unit for General Practice, Danish Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Rikke Sand AndersenAssociate Professor, Anthropologist, Research Unit for General Practice, Danish Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis (CaP), Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
René de-Pont ChristensenBiostatistician, Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Dorte Ejg JarbølAssociate Professor, Senior Researcher, GP, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe decision process of whether or not to contact the GP is influenced by different factors which have not all been well examined.

aimThe aim of this study was to analyse whether contact to the GP is associated with concern about the symptom, influence on daily activities and symptom burden, such as the total number of symptoms experienced by each person in a general population. DESIGN &

settingThis Danish nationwide cross-sectional study comprises a random sample of 100 000 people, representative of the adult Danish population ≥20 years.

methodBaseline data were collected in a web-based survey conducted from June to December 2012.

resultsIn total 49 706 (52.5%) individuals answered the questionnaire; 45 483 (91.5%) individuals experienced at least one of 44 predefined symptoms during the 4 weeks preceding the completion of the questionnaire. They reported 268 772 symptom experiences of which 58 370 symptoms (21.7%) resulted in contact with a GP. A high level of concern and influence on daily activities was associated with significantly higher odds for GP contact. A high burden of symptoms was associated with lower odds of contact with the GP.

conclusionApproximately every fifth symptom reported by individuals from the general population leads to GP contact. Influence on daily activities, burden of symptoms, and concern about the symptom were significant factors associated with the decision of whether to contact the GP. No overall association between sex and GP contact was observed.

Indexed as

behaviour and behaviour mechanismsgeneral practicehelp-seeking behaviourprimary health caresigns and symptoms

Identifiers

PMID30564656
PMCPMC6169954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.