Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564655›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2017

Are formalised implementation activities associated with aspects of quality of care in general practice? A cross-sectional study.

Jette V Le, Jesper Lykkegaard, Line B Pedersen, Helle Riisgaard, Jørgen Nexøe, Jeanette Lemmergaard, Jens Søndergaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jette V LePostdoctoral Fellow, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jesper LykkegaardPostdoctoral Fellow and GP, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Line B PedersenPostdoctoral Fellow, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health and COHERE, Department of Business Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Helle RiisgaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jørgen NexøeAssociate Professor and GP, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jeanette LemmergaardAssociate Professor, Department of Marketing & Management, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jens SøndergaardProfessor and GP, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a substantial variation in how different general practices manage knowledge implementation, including the degree to which activities are collectively and formally organised. Yet, it is unclear how these differences in implementation activities affect quality of care.

aimTo investigate if there are associations between specific formalised knowledge implementation activities and quality of care in general practices, exemplified by the use of spirometry testing. DESIGN &

settingA nationwide cross-sectional study combining survey and register data in Denmark.

methodAn electronic questionnaire was distributed to GPs, and data on spirometry testing among first-time users of medication against obstructive lung diseases were obtained from national registers. Associations were investigated using multilevel mixed-effect logit models.

resultsGPs from 1114 practices (58%) responded, and 33 788 patients were linked to a responding practice. In partnership practices, the frequency of interdisciplinary and GP meetings affected the quality of care. Interdisciplinary and GP meetings held on a weekly basis were significantly associated with a higher level of quality of care and this was measured by the odds ratio (OR) of patients having spirometry. The development of practice protocols and standard recordings in the electronic medical record (EMR) for a range of disease areas compared with few or no areas at all also impacted the quality of care level provided. The effect of formalised implementation activities was not as evident in single-handed practices as in partnerships.

conclusionThis study provides valuable knowledge for GPs who aim to organise their practice in a way that supports implementation and quality improvement most effectively. Also, results may be useful for managers of implementation strategies and quality improvement initiatives when planning future activities.

Indexed as

cross-sectional studyevidence-based practicegeneral practiceorganization and administrationquality of health care

Identifiers

PMID30564655
PMCPMC6169947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.