ReviewCureus2018
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Therapeutic Option for Neurologic and Psychiatric Illnesses.
Review in Cureus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of TES and rTMS for the Treatment of Insomnia: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Sham-Controlled Trials.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Deep Learning with Attention Mechanism for Pediatric Appendicitis Detection on Plain Abdominal Radiographs.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Versatility of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial Metabolism in Major Depressive Disorder: From Early Diagnosis to Emerging Treatment Options.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Headache and Other Pain Syndromes in Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Brain Connectivity Signature Extractions from TMS Invoked EEGs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Impact of oral motor task training on corticomotor pathways and diadochokinetic rates in young healthy participants.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Review
- Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on neurobiological changes in Alzheimer's disease (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2022Review
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Neurological Diseases.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, transcranial magnetic stimulation has become an area of interest in the field of neurosciences due to its ability to non-invasively induce sufficient electric current to depolarize superficial axons and networks in the cortex and can be used to explore brain functioning. Evidence shows that transcranial magnetic stimulation could be used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for various neurological and psychiatric illnesses. The aim of this review is to introduce the basics of this technology to the readers and to bring together an overview of some of its clinical applications investigated thus far.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.