Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564439›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2018

Are assortative mating and genital divergence driven by reinforcement?

Johan Hollander, Mauricio Montaño-Rendón, Giuseppe Bianco, Xi Yang, Anja M Westram, Ludovic Duvaux, David G Reid, Roger K Butlin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Genomic evidence for three distinct species in theConservation genetics (Print) · 2023
    Article
  5. Secondary contact rather than coexistence-Erebia butterflies in the Alps.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Johan HollanderDepartment of Biology, Aquatic Ecology Lund University 223 62 Lund Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4207-2956
Mauricio Montaño-RendónDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield S10 2TN Sheffield United Kingdom.
Giuseppe BiancoDepartment of Biology, Aquatic Ecology Lund University 223 62 Lund Sweden.
Xi YangDepartment of Biology, Aquatic Ecology Lund University 223 62 Lund Sweden.
Anja M WestramDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield S10 2TN Sheffield United Kingdom.
Ludovic DuvauxDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield S10 2TN Sheffield United Kingdom.
David G ReidDepartment of Life Sciences Natural History Museum SW7 5BD London United Kingdom.
Roger K ButlinDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield S10 2TN Sheffield United Kingdom.
Lund University · SEInstitute of Science and Technology Austria · ATNatural History Museum · GBUMR BIOdiversity, GEnes & Communities · FRUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of assortative mating is a key part of the speciation process. Stronger assortment, or greater divergence in mating traits, between species pairs with overlapping ranges is commonly observed, but possible causes of this pattern of reproductive character displacement are difficult to distinguish. We use a multidisciplinary approach to provide a rare example where it is possible to distinguish among hypotheses concerning the evolution of reproductive character displacement. We build on an earlier comparative analysis that illustrated a strong pattern of greater divergence in penis form between pairs of sister species with overlapping ranges than between allopatric sister-species pairs, in a large clade of marine gastropods (Littorinidae). We investigate both assortative mating and divergence in male genitalia in one of the sister-species pairs, discriminating among three contrasting processes each of which can generate a pattern of reproductive character displacement: reinforcement, reproductive interference and the Templeton effect. We demonstrate reproductive character displacement in assortative mating, but not in genital form between this pair of sister species and use demographic models to distinguish among the different processes. Our results support a model with no gene flow since secondary contact and thus favor reproductive interference as the cause of reproductive character displacement for mate choice, rather than reinforcement. High gene flow within species argues against the Templeton effect. Secondary contact appears to have had little impact on genital divergence.

Indexed as

gene‐flowgenitaliaLittorinidae, reproductive interference, assortative matingreinforcementreproductive character displacementspeciation

Identifiers

PMID30564439
PMCPMC6292706
OpenAlexW2897962983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.