Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564436›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2018

Cardiac rehabilitation to improve health-related quality of life following trans-catheter aortic valve implantation: a randomised controlled feasibility study: RECOVER-TAVI Pilot, ORCA 4, For the Optimal Restoration of Cardiac Activity Group.

Paula Rogers, Sayed Al-Aidrous, Winston Banya, Shelley Rahman Haley, Tarun Mittal, Tito Kabir, Vasileois Panoulas, Shahzad Raja, Sunil Bhudia, Heather Probert and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02921880 (Does Cardiac REhabilitation Improve Functional, Independence, Frailty and Emotional outCOmes Following Trans Catheter Aortic ValvE Replacement?), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02921880 nacompletednot on this map

Does Cardiac REhabilitation Improve Functional, Independence, Frailty and Emotional outCOmes Following Trans Catheter Aortic ValvE Replacement?

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation TrustRan2016 to 2017Enrolled30ConditionsAortic StenosisArmsCardiac Rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults after heart valve surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paula Rogers1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.
Sayed Al-Aidrous1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.
Winston Banya1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.
Shelley Rahman Haley1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.
Tarun Mittal1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.
Tito Kabir1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.
Vasileois Panoulas1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.
Shahzad Raja1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.
Sunil Bhudia1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.
Heather Probert1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.
Claire Prendergast1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.
Mark S Spence2Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Simon Davies1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.
Neil Moat1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.
Rod S Taylor3Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter & The School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Miles Dalby1Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust London, Imperial College, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0823-5093
University of Ulster · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is often undertaken in the oldest frailest cohort of patients undergoing cardiac interventions. We plan to investigate the potential benefit of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in this vulnerable population.

designWe undertook a pilot randomised trial of CR following TAVI to inform the feasibility and design of a future randomised clinical trial (RCT).

participantsWe screened patients undergoing TAVI at a single institution between June 2016 and February 2017.

interventionsParticipants were randomised post-TAVI to standard of care (control group) or standard of care plus exercise-based CR (intervention group). OUTCOMES: We assessed recruitment and attrition rates, uptake of CR, and explored changes in 6-min walk test, Nottingham Activities of Daily Living, Fried and Edmonton Frailty scores and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score, from baseline (30 days post TAVI) to 3 and 6 months post randomisation. We also undertook a parallel study to assess the use of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) in the post-TAVI population.

resultsOf 82 patients screened, 52 met the inclusion criteria and 27 were recruited (3 patients/month). In the intervention group, 10/13 (77%) completed the prescribed course of 6 sessions of CR (mean number of sessions attended 7.5, SD 4.25) over 6 weeks. At 6 months, all participants were retained for follow-up. There was apparent improvement in outcome scores at 3 and 6 months in control and CR groups. There were no recorded adverse events associated with the intervention of CR. The KCCQ was well accepted in 38 post-TAVI patients: mean summary score 72.6 (SD 22.6).

conclusionsWe have demonstrated the feasibility of recruiting post-TAVI patients into a randomised trial of CR. We will use the findings of this pilot trial to design a fully powered multicentre RCT to inform the provision of CR and support guideline development to optimise health-related quality of life outcomes in this vulnerable population. Retrospectively registered 3rd October 2016 clinicaltrials.gov NCT02921880.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.Gov identifier NCT02921880.

Indexed as

Cardiac rehabilitationPilot studyRandomised controlled trialTranscatheter aortic valve implantation

Identifiers

PMID30564436
PMCPMC6293531
OpenAlexW2904479278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.