ArticleRoyal Society open science2018
Detection of persistent signals and its relation to coherent feed-forward loops.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Network motifs and hypermotifs in TGFβ-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition and metastasis.Frontiers in systems biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many studies have shown that cells use the temporal dynamics of signalling molecules to encode information. One particular class of temporal dynamics is persistent and transient signals, i.e. signals of long and short duration, respectively. It has been shown that the coherent type-1 feed-forward loop with an AND logic at the output (or C1-FFL for short) can be used to discriminate a persistent input signal from a transient one. This has been done by modelling the C1-FFL, and then using the model to show that persistent and transient input signals give, respectively, a non-zero and zero output. The aim of this paper is to make a connection between the statistical detection of persistent signals and the C1-FFL. We begin by first formulating a statistical detection problem of distinguishing persistent signals from transient ones. The solution of the detection problem is to compute the log-likelihood ratio of observing a persistent signal to a transient signal. We show that, if this log-likelihood ratio is positive, which happens when the signal is likely to be persistent, then it can be approximately computed by a C1-FFL. Although the capability of C1-FFL to discriminate persistent signals is known, this paper adds an information processing interpretation on how a C1-FFL works as a detector of persistent signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.