Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564407›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2018

Improving short-term information spreading efficiency in scale-free networks by specifying top large-degree vertices as the initial spreaders.

Shuangyan Wang, Yunfeng Deng, Ying Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuangyan WangSchool of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7564-3674
Yunfeng DengChinese Academy of Governance, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Ying LiSchool of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The positive function of initially influential vertices could be exploited to improve spreading efficiency for short-term spreading in scale-free networks. However, the selection of initial spreaders depends on the specific scenes. The selection of initial spreaders needs to offer low complexity and low power consumption for short-term spreading. In this paper, we propose a selection strategy for efficiently spreading information by specifying a set of top large-degree vertices as the initially informed vertices. The essential idea behind the proposed selection strategy is to exploit the significant diffusion of the top large-degree vertices at the beginning of spreading. To evaluate the positive impact of initially influential vertices, we first build an information spreading model in the Barabási-Albert (BA) scale-free network; next, we design 54 comparative Monte Carlo experiments based on a benchmark strategy and the proposed selection strategy in different BA scale-free network structures. Experimental results indicate that (i) the proposed selection strategy can significantly improve spreading efficiency in the short-term spreading and (ii) both network size and number of hubs have a strong impact on spreading efficiency, while the number of initially informed vertices has a weak impact. The proposed selection strategy can be employed in short-term spreading, such as sending warnings or crisis information spreading or information spreading in emergency training or realistic emergency scenes.

Indexed as

complex networkinitially informed verticesscale-free networkshort-term information spreading strategyspreading efficiency

Identifiers

PMID30564407
PMCPMC6281924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.