Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564315›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2018

"To survey or to register" is that the question for estimating population incidence of injuries?

Dritan Bejko, Maria Ruiz-Castell, Anna Schritz, Bjarne Laursen, Rupert Kisser, Wim Rogmans, Ronan A Lyons, Huib Valkenberg, Samantha Turner, Robert Bauer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dritan Bejko1Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-3045-3030
Maria Ruiz-Castell1Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.
Anna Schritz1Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.
Bjarne Laursen2National Institute of Public Health, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rupert KisserEurosafe, Vienna, Austria.
Wim RogmansEurosafe, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronan A Lyons5Farr Institute Swansea University, Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Huib ValkenbergConsumer Safety Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Samantha Turner5Farr Institute Swansea University, Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Robert Bauer8Austrian Road Safety Board, Vienna, Austria.
Gabrielle EllsaesserLandesamt Brandenburg für Umwelt, Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz, Berlin, Germany.
Nathalie de RekeneireDirectorate of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_13043Medical Research Council MR/K006525/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasuring the true incidence of injury or medically attended injury is challenging. Population surveys, despite problems with recall and selection bias, remain the only source of information for injury incidence calculation in many countries. Emergency department (ED) registry based data provide an alternative source.The aim of this study is to compare the yearly incidence of hospital treated Home and Leisure Injuries (HLI), and Road Traffic Injuries (RTI) estimated by survey-based and register-based methods and combine information from both sources in to a comprehensive injury burden pyramide.

methodsData from Luxemburg's European Health Examination Survey (EHES-LUX), European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) and ED surveillance system Injury Data Base (IDB) collected in 2013, were used. EHES-LUX data on 1529 residents 25-64 years old, were collected between February 2013-January 2015. EHIS data on 4004 other residents aged 15+ years old, were collected between February and December 2014. Participants reported last year's injuries at home, leisure and traffic and treatment received. Two-sided exact binomial tests were used to compare incidences from registry with the incidences of each survey by age group and prevention domain. Data from surveys and register were combined to build an RTI and HLI burden pyramide for the 25-64 years old. This project was part of the European Union project BRIDGE-Health (BRidging Information and Data Generation for Evidence-based Health Policy and Research).

resultsAmong 25-64 years old the incidence of hospital treated injuries per thousand population was 60.1 (95% CI: 59.2-60.9) according to IDB, 62.1 (95% CI: 50.6-75.4) according to EHES-LUX and 53.2 (95% CI: 45.0-62.4) according to EHIS. The incidence of hospital admissions was 3.7 (95% CI: 3.5-4.0) per thousand population from IDB-Luxembourg, 12.4 (95% CI: 7.5-19.3) from EHES-LUX and 18.0 (95% CI: 13.3-23.8) from EHIS. For 15+ years-old incidence of hospital treated HLI was 62.8 (95% CI: 62.1-63.5) per thousand population according to IDB whereas the corresponding EHIS estimate was lower at 46.9 (95% CI: 40.4-54.0). About half of HLI and RTI of the 25-64 years old were treated in hospital.

conclusionThe overall incidence estimate of hospital treated injuries from both methods does not differ for the 25-64 years old. Surveys overestimate the number of hospital admissions, probably due to memory bias. For people aged 15+ years, the survey estimate is lower than the register estimate for hospital treated HLI injuries, probably due to selection and recall biases. ED based registry data is to be preferred as single source for estimating the incidence of hospital treated injuries in all age groups.

Indexed as

BRIDGE healthHome and leisure accidentsHospital treated injuriesInjuries incidenceRegisterSurvey

Identifiers

PMID30564315
PMCPMC6296149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.