Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564313›Full record

ArticleLight, science & applications2018

Full-field interferometric imaging of propagating action potentials.

Tong Ling, Kevin C Boyle, Georges Goetz, Peng Zhou, Yi Quan, Felix S Alfonso, Tiffany W Huang, Daniel Palanker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Light, science & applications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Ultrafast tomograms in a flash.Science advances · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. The wave nature of the action potential.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tong Ling1Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9009-7966
Kevin C Boyle3Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9539-6786
Georges Goetz1Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Peng Zhou4Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Yi Quan2Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Felix S Alfonso5Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Tiffany W Huang3Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Daniel Palanker1Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Stanford University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Interferometric Optophysiology of the Human RetinaU01EY025501 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ROORDA, AUSTIN · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, cellular action potentials are detected using either electrical recordings or exogenous fluorescent probes that sense the calcium concentration or transmembrane voltage. Ca imaging has a low temporal resolution, while voltage indicators are vulnerable to phototoxicity, photobleaching, and heating. Here, we report full-field interferometric imaging of individual action potentials by detecting movement across the entire cell membrane. Using spike-triggered averaging of movies synchronized with electrical recordings, we demonstrate deformations up to 3 nm (0.9 mrad) during the action potential in spiking HEK-293 cells, with a rise time of 4 ms. The time course of the optically recorded spikes matches the electrical waveforms. Since the shot noise limit of the camera (~2 mrad/pix) precludes detection of the action potential in a single frame, for all-optical spike detection, images are acquired at 50 kHz, and 50 frames are binned into 1 ms steps to achieve a sensitivity of 0.3 mrad in a single pixel. Using a self-reinforcing sensitivity enhancement algorithm based on iteratively expanding the region of interest for spatial averaging, individual spikes can be detected by matching the previously extracted template of the action potential with the optical recording. This allows all-optical full-field imaging of the propagating action potentials without exogeneous labels or electrodes.

Identifiers

PMID30564313
PMCPMC6290013
OpenAlexW2827094866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.