Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564263›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

Plant Genebanks: Present Situation and Proposals for Their Improvement. the Case of the Spanish Network.

María José Díez, Lucía De la Rosa, Isaura Martín, Luís Guasch, María Elena Cartea, Cristina Mallor, Joan Casals, Joan Simó, Ana Rivera, German Anastasio and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. New insights in the Spanish gene pool of olive (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

María José DíezMixed Unity for the Valorization and Breeding of Horticultural Landraces, Institute for the Conservation and Improvement of Valencian Agrodiversity, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Lucía De la RosaSpanish Plant Genetic Resources National Center, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Isaura MartínSpanish Plant Genetic Resources National Center, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Luís GuaschSpanish Plant Genetic Resources National Center, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
María Elena CarteaGroup of Genetics, Breeding and Biochemistry of Brassicas, Misión Biológica de Galicia, Spanish Council for Scientific Research, Pontevedra, Spain.
Cristina MallorAgrifood Research and Technology Centre of Aragón, Agrifood Institute of Aragón, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Joan CasalsMixed Unity for the Valorization and Breeding of Horticultural Landraces, Miquel Agustí Foundation. Department of Agrifood Engineering and Biotechnology, BarcelonaTech, Castelldefels, Spain.
Joan SimóMixed Unity for the Valorization and Breeding of Horticultural Landraces, Miquel Agustí Foundation. Department of Agrifood Engineering and Biotechnology, BarcelonaTech, Castelldefels, Spain.
Ana RiveraMixed Unity for the Valorization and Breeding of Horticultural Landraces, Miquel Agustí Foundation. Department of Agrifood Engineering and Biotechnology, BarcelonaTech, Castelldefels, Spain.
German AnastasioDepartment of Plant Breeding, FITO Seeds, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaime ProhensMixed Unity for the Valorization and Breeding of Horticultural Landraces, Institute for the Conservation and Improvement of Valencian Agrodiversity, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Salvador SolerMixed Unity for the Valorization and Breeding of Horticultural Landraces, Institute for the Conservation and Improvement of Valencian Agrodiversity, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
José BlancaInstitute for the Conservation and Improvement of Valencian Agrodiversity, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
José Vicente ValcárcelInstitute for the Conservation and Improvement of Valencian Agrodiversity, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Francesc CasañasMixed Unity for the Valorization and Breeding of Horticultural Landraces, Miquel Agustí Foundation. Department of Agrifood Engineering and Biotechnology, BarcelonaTech, Castelldefels, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genebanks were created by the middle of the twentieth century to preserve cultivated biodiversity when landraces began to be substituted by modern varieties. This move was generally accepted as a necessary step to safeguard the future. After about 75 years of collecting and maintaining genetic resources, the increasing ability of biotechnology to create new variability brings the roles of genebanks in the present and near future into question. As a continuation of several workshops that started in 2014, staff of some representative genebanks have met to discuss how the Spanish Plant Genetic Resources Network can be improved, identifying the following major shortcomings: lack of efficient coordination in the distribution of species among genebanks; too many genebanks; existence of detected and undetected duplicates; insufficient rate of regeneration; insufficient phenotyping, genotyping, and epiphenotyping; unsatisfactory rate of use by end users; and, insufficient funding. As a considerable increase in public funding is unlikely, we propose some strategies to increase the efficiency of the system. The most urgent tasks are to strengthen the rationalization of the network by establishing a clear hierarchy and functions, to improve the information in the base collection by deep characterization including not only phenotypes but also uses and utilities, to progressively replace the active collections with focused core collections constructed to meet users' needs, to optimize regeneration protocols, to limit new collecting expeditions of Spanish crop wild relatives to those growing in threatened habitats, and to develop user-friendly platforms to access germplasm documentation, including a unified system of descriptors and classification categories. Current advances in biotechnology, and especially those in gene editing will have without doubt an impact on the role of genebanks. However, the high number of genes and gene combinations created by evolution they hold cannot be produced by these techniques at present. So, these reservoirs of variability will continue to be indispensable for the near-medium future while the function of all the genes is unveiled. In turn, biotechnologies and gene editing will allow us to take advantage of the information held in genebanks in a more efficient and fast way, contributing to a better rationalization and functioning.

Indexed as

crop wild relativesex situ conservationgene conservationgenetic variabilitylandracesphenotypic variationplant genetic resourcesseedbanks

Identifiers

PMID30564263
PMCPMC6288731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.