Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30564189›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2018

Clinically Available Low Intensity Ultrasound Devices do not Promote Axonal Regeneration After Peripheral Nerve Surgery-A Preclinical Investigation of an FDA-Approved Device.

Simeon C Daeschler, Leila Harhaus, Konstantin D Bergmeister, Arne Boecker, Bernd Hoener, Ulrich Kneser, Philipp Schoenle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Current neuropharmacology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simeon C DaeschlerDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, University of Heidelberg, BG Trauma Hospital Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Leila HarhausDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, University of Heidelberg, BG Trauma Hospital Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Konstantin D BergmeisterDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, University of Heidelberg, BG Trauma Hospital Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Arne BoeckerDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, University of Heidelberg, BG Trauma Hospital Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Bernd HoenerFaculty of Social Sciences and Law, SRH University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ulrich KneserDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, University of Heidelberg, BG Trauma Hospital Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Philipp SchoenleDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, University of Heidelberg, BG Trauma Hospital Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Klinikum Ludwigshafen · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The slow axonal regeneration and consecutive delayed muscle reinnervation cause persistent functional deficits following peripheral nerve injury, even following sufficient surgical nerve reconstruction. Preclinically, adjunct ultrasound therapy has shown to significantly accelerate nerve regeneration and thereby improve muscle function compared to nerve reconstruction alone. However, although FDA-approved and clinically well-tested ultrasound devices for other conditions such as delayed-healing fractures are available, they have not been investigated for peripheral nerve injury yet. Aiming to provide a fast clinical translation, we evaluated EXOGEN (Bioventus LLC, Durham, USA), a clinical device for low-intensity ultrasound therapy in various treatment intervals following peripheral nerve surgery. Sixty rats, randomized to five groups of twelve animals each, underwent median nerve transection and primary epineural nerve reconstruction. Post-surgically the ultrasound therapy (duration: 2 min, frequency: 1.5 MHz, pulsed SATA-intensity: 30 mW/cm

Indexed as

experimental studiesmicrosurgerynerve regenerationnerve surgeryperipheral nerve injuriesreinnervationultrasound therapy

Identifiers

PMID30564189
PMCPMC6288234
OpenAlexW2902808888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.