ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2018
Reporting Guidelines and Issues to Consider for Using Intracranial Brain Stimulation in Studies of Human Declarative Memory.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptability of Neuroscientific Interventions in Education.Science and engineering ethics · 2021Article
- Projections and the Potential Societal Impact of the Future of Neurotechnologies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Wireless Programmable Recording and Stimulation of Deep Brain Activity in Freely Moving Humans.Neuron · 2020Article
- Technology Integration Methods for Bi-directional Brain-computer Interfaces and XR-based Interventions.Conference proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · 2020Article
- Modulation of Human Memory by Deep Brain Stimulation of the Entorhinal-Hippocampal Circuitry.Neuron · 2020Review
- Commentary: Stimulation of the Posterior Cingulate Cortex Impairs Episodic Memory Encoding.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Interictal Epileptiform Discharges and the Quality of Human Intracranial Neurophysiology Data.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Memory Prosthesis: Is It Time for a Deep Neuromimetic Computing Approach?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Stimulation of the right entorhinal white matter enhances visual memory encoding in humans.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Participants with stimulating and recording electrodes implanted within the brain for clinical evaluation and treatment provide a rare opportunity to unravel the neuronal correlates of human memory, as well as offer potential for modulation of behavior. Recent intracranial stimulation studies of memory have been inconsistent in methodologies employed and reported conclusions, which renders generalizations and construction of a framework impossible. In an effort to unify future study efforts and enable larger meta-analyses we propose in this mini-review a set of guidelines to consider when pursuing intracranial stimulation studies of human declarative memory and summarize details reported by previous relevant studies. We present technical and safety issues to consider when undertaking such studies and a checklist for researchers and clinicians to use for guidance when reporting results, including targeting, placement, and localization of electrodes, behavioral task design, stimulation and electrophysiological recording methods, details of participants, and statistical analyses. We hope that, as research in invasive stimulation of human declarative memory further progresses, these reporting guidelines will aid in setting standards for multicenter studies, in comparison of findings across studies, and in study replications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.