Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30563978›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2019

Beyond 5 years: enduring risk of recurrence in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Juliet Richman, Mitch Dowsett

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Twenty-Year Benefit From Adjuvant Goserelin and Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Patients With Breast Cancer in a Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juliet RichmanRalph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. juliet.richman@icr.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7414-9471
Mitch DowsettRalph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Royal Marsden Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women with early-stage oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomic InstabilityHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID30563978
OpenAlexW2903961359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.