ArticleCMAJ open
Pharmaceutical cannabinoid use in Manitoba, 2004/05 to 2014/15: a population-based cross-sectional study.
Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Cannabis is legal-why are cannabis-based pharmaceuticals still controlled?Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPCArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPharmaceutically derived cannabinoids are used for several indications, particularly pain management. The extent of their use from a population perspective is unknown; hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate trends in pharmaceutical cannabinoid use in Manitoba.
methodsThis was a retrospective population-based cross-sectional study using administrative data from the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. Pharmaceutical cannabinoid users residing in Manitoba from Apr. 1, 2004, to Mar. 31, 2015 were identified. We assessed the annual prevalence and incidence of pharmaceutical cannabinoid use, and the sociodemographic characteristics and medical conditions of users.
resultsWe identified 5181 people who received at least 1 prescription for a pharmaceutical cannabinoid over the study period, 5033 of whom received their first prescription after Apr. 1, 2004. Nabilone accounted for 73 650 (96.0%) of all prescriptions dispensed; dronabinol was discontinued during the study period. The annual prevalence rate of use increased by 527.2%, from 21.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.4-21.6) users per 100 000 people in 2004/05 to 134.9 (95% CI 134.7-135.1) users per 100 000 people in 2014/15. The annual incidence rate increased by 413.3%, from 12.1 (95% CI 12.1-12.2) users per 100 000 person-years in 2004/05 to 62.2 (95% CI 62.1-62.4) users per 100 000 person-years in 2014/15. The highest use was among older adults aged 46-64 years, females and urban area residents. One-third of incident users (1775 [35.3%]) had a diagnosis of fibromyalgia in a 2-year period before their first cannabinoid prescription. General practitioners initiated almost half (2350 [46.7%]) of first prescriptions, and anesthesiologists/pain specialists initiated one-quarter (1299 [25.8%]).
interpretationThe prevalence and incidence of pharmaceutical cannabinoid use increased over time. These findings provide insight into the use of cannabinoids before the introduction of recreational marijuana, which may affect this trend.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.