Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30563856›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Dorsal striatal dopamine D1 receptor availability predicts an instrumental bias in action learning.

Lieke de Boer, Jan Axelsson, Rumana Chowdhury, Katrine Riklund, Raymond J Dolan, Lars Nyberg, Lars Bäckman, Marc Guitart-Masip

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Activation of D1 receptors affects human reactivity and flexibility to valued cues.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dopamine D1-Receptor Organization Contributes to Functional Brain Architecture.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lieke de BoerAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17165, Stockholm, Sweden; liekelotte@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3381-2040
Jan AxelssonDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Rumana ChowdhuryDepartment of Neurology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Leeds LS1 3EX, United Kingdom.
Katrine RiklundDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Raymond J DolanMax Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom.
Lars NybergDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3367-1746
Lars BäckmanAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17165, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marc Guitart-MasipAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17165, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUmeå University · SENational Health Service · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning to act to obtain reward and inhibit to avoid punishment is easier compared with learning the opposite contingencies. This coupling of action and valence is often thought of as a Pavlovian bias, although recent research has shown it may also emerge through instrumental mechanisms. We measured this learning bias with a rewarded go/no-go task in 60 adults of different ages. Using computational modeling, we characterized the bias as being instrumental. To assess the role of endogenous dopamine (DA) in the expression of this bias, we quantified DA D1 receptor availability using positron emission tomography (PET) with the radioligand [

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsAttentional BiasBrainCorpus StriatumHumansLearningModels, PsychologicalPositron-Emission TomographyReceptors, Dopamine D1RewardYoung AdultReceptors, Dopamine D1decision makingdopamineinstrumental learningPavlovian biaspositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID30563856
PMCPMC6320523
OpenAlexW2904911604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.