Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30563825›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2018

Identifying mouse developmental essential genes using machine learning.

David Tian, Stephanie Wenlock, Mitra Kabir, George Tzotzos, Andrew J Doig, Kathryn E Hentges

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. dbEssLnc: A manually curated database of human and mouse essential lncRNA genes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  7. UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase 2, a regulator of glycogen synthesis and glycosylation, is critical for pancreatic cancer growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Essential gene prediction inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David TianDivision of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Stephanie WenlockDivision of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Mitra KabirDivision of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
George TzotzosDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona 60121, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9258-4338
Andrew J DoigManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK andrew.doig@manchester.ac.uk Kathryn.Hentges@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0346-2270
Kathryn E HentgesDivision of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK andrew.doig@manchester.ac.uk Kathryn.Hentges@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8917-3765
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBMarche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L018276/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genes that are required for organismal survival are annotated as 'essential genes'. Identifying all the essential genes of an animal species can reveal critical functions that are needed during the development of the organism. To inform studies on mouse development, we developed a supervised machine learning classifier based on phenotype data from mouse knockout experiments. We used this classifier to predict the essentiality of mouse genes lacking experimental data. Validation of our predictions against a blind test set of recent mouse knockout experimental data indicated a high level of accuracy (>80%). We also validated our predictions for other mouse mutagenesis methodologies, demonstrating that the predictions are accurate for lethal phenotypes isolated in random chemical mutagenesis screens and embryonic stem cell screens. The biological functions that are enriched in essential and non-essential genes have been identified, showing that essential genes tend to encode intracellular proteins that interact with nucleic acids. The genome distribution of predicted essential and non-essential genes was analysed, demonstrating that the density of essential genes varies throughout the genome. A comparison with human essential and non-essential genes was performed, revealing conservation between human and mouse gene essentiality status. Our genome-wide predictions of mouse essential genes will be of value for the planning of mouse knockout experiments and phenotyping assays, for understanding the functional processes required during mouse development, and for the prioritisation of disease candidate genes identified in human genome and exome sequence datasets.

Indexed as

Genes, DevelopmentalGenes, EssentialMachine LearningAlgorithmsAnimalsChromosomes, MammalianConserved SequenceDatabases, GeneticGene OntologyHumansMiceMolecular Sequence AnnotationMutagenesisPhenotypePoint MutationProtein Interaction MapsEssential genesEssentiality databaseMouse knockoutSupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID30563825
PMCPMC6307915
OpenAlexW2898311987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.