Trial reportThe Lancet. Neurology2019
Safety and efficacy of pridopidine in patients with Huntington's disease (PRIDE-HD): a phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre, dose-ranging study.
Trial report in The Lancet. Neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02006472 (A Phase 2, Dose-Finding, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study, Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Pridopidine 45, 67.5, 90, and 112.5 mg Twice-Daily vs Placebo for Symptomatic Treatment in Patients With Huntington's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Dose-Finding, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study, Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Pridopidine 45, 67.5, 90, and 112.5 mg Twice-Daily vs Placebo for Symptomatic Treatment in Patients With Huntington's Disease
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of the Huntington's Disease Drug Development Pipeline, 2014 to 2025.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of VMAT-2 Inhibitors and Dopamine Stabilizers for Huntington's Chorea: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Pridopidine for the Improvement of Motor Function in Patients With Huntington's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of PrimeC in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: The PARADIGM Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA neurology · 2026Trial
- Pridopidine in early-stage manifest Huntington's disease: a phase 3 trial.Nature medicine · 2025Trial
- Phase II trial of intravenous human dental pulp stem cell therapy for Huntington's disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Trial
- Modeling Disease Progression and Placebo Response in Huntington Disease: Insights From Enroll-HD and GENERATION HD1 Cohorts.Neurology · 2025Trial
- Pepinemab antibody blockade of SEMA4D in early Huntington's disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.Nature medicine · 2022Trial
- Effects of Pridopidine on Functional Capacity in Early-Stage Participants from the PRIDE-HD Study.Journal of Huntington's disease · 2020Trial
- Digital Motor Outcomes Capture Upper Limb and Mild Stage Impairment in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Pridopidine Mediated Sigma-1 Receptor Activation and Therapeutic Implications in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Longitudinal assessment of chorea in Huntington's disease using digital passive monitoring.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Neuroprotective Effects of Two N-Benzylamides in Models of Oxidative Stress, Neurite Outgrowth and Neurodegeneration.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2026Article
- Pridopidine, a Potent and Selective Therapeutic Sigma-1 Receptor (S1R) Agonist for Treating Neurodegenerative Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Digital Outcomes of Upper Limb Ataxia Capture Meaningful Longitudinal Change and Treatment Response.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Article
- Integrated Modeling of Digital-Motor and Clinician-Reported Outcomes Using Item Response Theory: Towards Powerful Trials for Rare Neurological Diseases.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Observational
- Baicalein-mediated regulation of Nrf2/ARE, NFĸB, and MAPK signaling in Huntington's disease: a promising strategy against neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- Mitochondria and Endoplasmic Reticulum Contact Site as a Regulator of Proteostatic Stress Responses in Neurodegenerative Diseases.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Update on the Symptomatic Treatment of Huntington's Disease: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Safety Profile of Pridopidine, a Novel Sigma-1 Receptor Agonist for the Treatment of Huntington's Disease.CNS drugs · 2025Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious trials have shown that pridopidine might reduce motor impairment in patients with Huntington's disease. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether higher doses of pridopidine than previously tested reduce motor symptoms in a dose-dependent manner while maintaining acceptable safety and tolerability.
methodsPRIDE-HD was a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2, dose-ranging study in adults (aged ≥21 years) with Huntington's disease at outpatient clinics in 53 sites across 12 countries (Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Russia, the Netherlands, the UK, and the USA). Eligible patients had clinical onset after age 18 years, 36 or more cytosine-adenine-guanine repeats in the huntingtin gene, motor symptoms (Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale total motor score [UHDRS-TMS] ≥25 points), and reduced independence (UHDRS independence score ≤90%). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) with centralised interactive-response technology to receive one of four doses of pridopidine (45, 67·5, 90, or 112·5 mg) or placebo orally twice a day for 52 weeks. Randomisation was stratified within centres by neuroleptic drug use. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in the UHDRS-TMS from baseline to 26 weeks, which was assessed in all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment (full analysis set). Participants and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2013-001888-23) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02006472).
findingsBetween Feb 13, 2014, and July 5, 2016, 408 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=82) or pridopidine 45 mg (n=81), 67·5 mg (n=82), 90 mg (n=81), or 112·5 mg (n=82) twice daily for 26 weeks. The full analysis set included 397 patients (81 in the placebo group, 75 in the 45 mg group, 79 in the 67·5 mg group, 81 in the 90 mg group, and 81 in the 112·5 mg group). Pridopidine did not significantly change the UHDRS-TMS at 26 weeks compared with placebo at any dose. The most frequent adverse events across all groups were diarrhoea, vomiting, nasopharyngitis, falls, headache, insomnia, and anxiety. The most common treatment-related adverse events were insomnia, diarrhoea, nausea, and dizziness. Serious adverse events occurred in the pridopidine groups only and were most frequently falls (n=5), suicide attempt (n=4), suicidal ideation (n=3), head injury (n=3), and aspiration pneumonia (n=3). No new safety or tolerability concerns emerged in this study. One death in the pridopidine 112·5 mg group due to aspiration pneumonia was considered to be possibly related to the study drug.
interpretationPridopidine did not improve the UHDRS-TMS at week 26 compared with placebo and, thus, the results of secondary or tertiary analyses in previous trials were not replicated. A potentially strong placebo effect needs to be ruled out in future studies.
fundingTeva Pharmaceutical Industries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.