Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30563724›Full record

ReviewTrends in biochemical sciences2019

Hitting Undruggable Targets: Viewing Stabilized Peptide Development through the Lens of Quantitative Systems Pharmacology.

Lydia Atangcho, Tejas Navaratna, Greg M Thurber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in biochemical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mapping the binding sites of challenging drug targets.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Peptide-Based Inhibitors of ADAM and ADAMTS Metalloproteinases.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Directed Evolution Using Stabilized Bacterial Peptide Display.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lydia AtangchoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Tejas NavaratnaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Greg M ThurberDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: gthurber@umich.edu.

Funding

Maximizing Antibody Drug Conjugate Efficacy through Multiple Mechanisms of ActionR35GM128819 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Greg Thurber · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stabilized peptide therapeutics have the potential to hit currently undruggable targets, dramatically expanding the druggable genome. However, major obstacles to their development include poor intracellular delivery, rapid degradation, low target affinity, and membrane toxicity. With the emergence of multiple stabilization techniques and screening technologies, the high efficacy of various bioactive peptides has been demonstrated in vitro, albeit with limited success in vivo. We discuss here the chemical and pharmacokinetic barriers to achieving in vivo efficacy, analyze the characteristics of FDA-approved peptide drugs, and propose a developmental tool that considers the molecular properties of stabilized peptides in a comprehensive and quantitative manner to achieve the necessary rates for in vivo delivery to the target, efficacy, and ultimately clinical translation.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug DesignHumansPeptidesPeptides, CyclicPeptidesPeptides, Cyclicalpha helicescyclic peptideslipophilicitymacrocyclespharmacokineticsstabilized peptides

Identifiers

PMID30563724
PMCPMC6661118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.