Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30563567›Full record

SynthesisJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale2018

Functional outcomes in early (T1/T2) supraglottic cancer: a systematic review.

Benjamin van der Woerd, Krupal B Patel, Anthony C Nichols, Kevin Fung, John Yoo, S Danielle MacNeil

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: what internists should know.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin van der WoerdDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Schulich Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4189-2733
Krupal B PatelDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Anthony C NicholsDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Schulich Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
Kevin FungDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Schulich Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
John YooDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Schulich Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
S Danielle MacNeilDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Schulich Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada. Danielle.MacNeil@lhsc.on.ca.
Western University · CAThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOrgan preserving surgery (OPS) and radiotherapy (RT) are both accepted treatment options for early stage supraglottic cancer (SGC). Radiation has supplanted surgery in most cases, because of the perception that surgery results in poorer functional outcomes. However, evidence suggests that OPS with a neck dissection may be associated with improved survival. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to compare functional outcomes of OPS and RT for early SGC.

methodsWe searched Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify studies. Studies were included if they reported functional outcomes on 10 or more patients with early stage SGC treated with radiation or OPS, including open partial laryngectomy, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) or transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Two reviewers independently screened articles for relevance using pre-determined criteria.

resultsFrom 7720 references, we included 10 articles (n = 640 patients). 50% (n = 320) of patients were treated with surgery. Three head-to-head RT versus OPS papers were included, however different outcome measures were used for each group. Intractable aspiration management (including total laryngectomy or permanent tracheostomy) following OPS was reported in five papers representing 186 patients; the definitive intractable aspiration management rate was 2.6% (95% CI 1.0-6.8%). Four papers reported permanent G-tube rate for the surgical group (n = 198), calculating a rate of 5.3% (95% CI 2.6-10.5%), this was not reported for the RT group in any papers. One study reported quality of life. Two studies reported objective voice measures.

conclusionsThis systematic review revealed a paucity of objective measures and significant data heterogeneity, rendering the comparison of functional outcomes following OPS versus RT for early SGC limited. Future research should include objective measures of functional outcomes including laryngectomy rate, g-tube rate, tracheostomy dependence, quality of life, and voice quality measures.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHumansLaryngeal NeoplasmsLaryngectomyNeck DissectionOrgan Sparing TreatmentsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeEarly stageFunctional outcomesOutcomesSupraglottic SCCSupraglottic squamous cell carcinomaSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30563567
PMCPMC6299571
OpenAlexW2905585855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.