Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30563533›Full record

SynthesisMalaria journal2018

Using the human blood index to investigate host biting plasticity: a systematic review and meta-regression of the three major African malaria vectors.

James Orsborne, Luis Furuya-Kanamori, Claire L Jeffries, Mojca Kristan, Abdul Rahim Mohammed, Yaw A Afrane, Kathleen O'Reilly, Eduardo Massad, Chris Drakeley, Thomas Walker and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Human Blood Index ofJournal of tropical medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Blood Meal Sources ofInsects · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

James OrsborneDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Luis Furuya-KanamoriDepartment of Population Medicine, College of Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Claire L JeffriesDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Mojca KristanDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Abdul Rahim MohammedDepartment of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Yaw A AfraneDepartment of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Kathleen O'ReillyDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Eduardo MassadSchool of Applied Mathematics, Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Chris DrakeleyDepartment of Immunology & Infection, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Thomas WalkerDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Laith YakobDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Laith.yakob@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8639-4511

Funding

Impact of insecticide resistance on the behavior and fitness of malaria vectorsR01AI123074 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GHANA · PI YAW ASARE AFRANE · 2016 to 2026
$1.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123074royal society RSG\R1\180203Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 101285/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe proportion of mosquito blood-meals that are of human origin, referred to as the 'human blood index' or HBI, is a key determinant of malaria transmission.

methodsA systematic review was conducted followed by meta-regression of the HBI for the major African malaria vectors.

resultsEvidence is presented for higher HBI among Anopheles gambiae (M/S forms and Anopheles coluzzii/An. gambiae sensu stricto are not distinguished for most studies and, therefore, combined) as well as Anopheles funestus when compared with Anopheles arabiensis (prevalence odds ratio adjusted for collection location [i.e. indoor or outdoor]: 1.62; 95% CI 1.09-2.42; 1.84; 95% CI 1.35-2.52, respectively). This finding is in keeping with the entomological literature which describes An. arabiensis to be more zoophagic than the other major African vectors. However, analysis also revealed that HBI was more associated with location of mosquito captures (R

conclusionsThese findings call into question the appropriateness of current methods of assessing host preferences among disease vectors and have important implications for strategizing vector control.

Indexed as

AfricaAnimalsAnophelesBlood Chemical AnalysisFeeding BehaviorHumansMalariaMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsBiting preferenceBlood indexBlood meal analysisHost preferenceMosquito

Identifiers

PMID30563533
PMCPMC6299493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.