Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30563528›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2018

Use of Bayesian methods to model the SF-6D health state preference based data.

Samer A Kharroubi

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Samer A KharroubiDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, P.O.BOX: 11-0236, Riad El Solh 1107-2020, Beirut, Lebanon. sk157@aub.edu.lb.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2355-2719

Funding

American University of Beirut 103366LB NATL COUNCIL FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (CNRS) 103541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventionally, models used for health state valuation data have been frequentists. Recently a number of researchers have investigated the use of Bayesian methods in this area. The aim of this paper is to put on the map of modelling a new approach to estimating SF-6D health state utility values using Bayesian methods. This will help health care professionals in deriving better health state utilities of the original UK SF-6D for their specialized applications.

methodsThe valuation study is composed of 249 SF-6D health states valued by a representative sample of the UK population using the standard gamble technique. Throughout this paper, we present four different models, including one simple linear regression model and three random effect models. The predictive ability of these models is assessed by comparing predicted and observed mean SF-6D scores, R

resultsThe random effects model with interaction model performs best under all criterions, with mean predicted error of 0.166, R

conclusionsThe Bayesian models provide flexible approaches to estimate mean SF-6D utility estimates, including characterizing the full range of uncertainty inherent in these estimates. We hope that this work will provide applied researchers with a practical set of tools to appropriately model outcomes in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremHealth StatusQuality of LifeCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesBayesian methodsCost-utility analysisMCMCPreference based health statesSF-6D

Identifiers

PMID30563528
PMCPMC6299638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.