Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30563450›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2018

Canopy attachment position influences metabolism and peel constituency of European pear fruit.

Sara Serra, Nathanael Sullivan, James P Mattheis, Stefano Musacchi, David R Rudell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Eigenlipids for exploring lipid biology.Journal of lipid research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Analysis of the Fruit Quality of Pear (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara SerraTree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA, 98801, USA.
Nathanael SullivanTree Fruit Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wenatchee, WA, 98801, USA.
James P MattheisTree Fruit Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wenatchee, WA, 98801, USA.
Stefano MusacchiTree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA, 98801, USA.
David R RudellTree Fruit Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wenatchee, WA, 98801, USA. David.Rudell@ars.usda.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6033-8829
Tree Fruit Research Laboratory · USWashington Tree Fruit Research Commission · US

Funding

Agricultural Research Service 2094-43000-007-00-DWashington Tree Fruit Research Commission PR14-108A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInconsistent pear fruit ripening resulting from variable harvest maturity within tree canopies can contribute to postharvest losses through senescence and spoilage that would otherwise be effectively managed using crop protectant and storage regimes. Because those inconsistencies are likely based on metabolic differences, non-targeted metabolic profiling peel of 'd'Anjou' pears harvested from the external or internal canopy was used to determine the breadth of difference and link metabolites with canopy position during long-term controlled atmosphere storage.

resultsDifferences were widespread, encompassing everything from expected distinctions in flavonol glycoside levels between peel of fruit from external and internal canopy positions to increased aroma volatile production and sucrose hydrolysis with ripening. Some of the most substantial differences were in levels of triterpene and phenolic peel cuticle components among which acyl esters of ursolic acid and fatty acyl esters of p-coumaryl alcohol were higher in the cuticle of fruit from external tree positions, and acyl esters of α-amyrin were elevated in peel of fruit from internal positions. Possibly the most substantial dissimilarities were those that were directly related to fruit quality. Phytosterol conjugates and sesquiterpenes related to elevated superficial scald risk were higher in pears from external positions which were to be potentially rendered unmarketable by superficial scald. Other metabolites associated with fruit aroma and flavor became more prevalent in external fruit peel as ripening progressed and, likewise, with differential soluble solids and ethylene levels, suggesting the final product not only ripens differentially but the final fruit quality following ripening is actually different based on the tree position.

conclusionsGiven the impact tree position appears to have on the most intrinsic aspects of ripening and quality, every supply chain management strategy would likely lead to diverse storage outcomes among fruit from most orchards, especially those with large canopies. Metabolites consistently associated with peel of fruit from a particular canopy position may provide targets for non-destructive pre-storage sorting used to reduce losses contributed by this inconsistency.

Indexed as

Food StorageMetabolic Networks and PathwaysFruitPhytosterolsPrincipal Component AnalysisPyrusSesquiterpenesPhytosterolsSesquiterpenesLightNon-targeted metabolomicsOrchard environmentPhenylpropanoidPostharvestPyrus communis LQualityRipeningStorageSuperficial scaldTriterpene

Identifiers

PMID30563450
PMCPMC6299602
OpenAlexW2904205906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.