ArticleBMC genomics2018
Accuracy of genomic selection for growth and wood quality traits in two control-pollinated progeny trials using exome capture as the genotyping platform in Norway spruce.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic models for accurate estimation of breeding values in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis Bong. Carr).Heredity · 2026Article
- Uncertainty-aware breeding decisions: MCMC-based optimum contribution selection increases breeding decision robustness.Genetics · 2026Article
- Integrating GWAS-guided markers preselection with genomic selection enhances prediction of pulpwood-related traits in slash pine (Pinus elliottii Englem.).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Breeding for climate adaptation: genetic variation and genomic selection for drought response in Scots pine.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Multivariate models improve accuracy of genomic prediction for spring frost tolerance in Norway spruce.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Application and development prospect of genomic selection breeding in coniferous trees.Planta · 2025Review
- Genomic selection for growth and wood properties in multi-generation hybrid populations ofHorticulture research · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Evaluation and DNA Fingerprints ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cross-generational genomic prediction of Norway spruce (Picea abies) wood properties: an evaluation using independent validation.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- Forest tree breeding using genomic Markov causal models: a new approach to genomic tree breeding improvement.Heredity · 2025Article
- Article
- Development of a 101.6K liquid-phased probe for GWAS and genomic selection in pine wilt disease-resistance breeding in Masson pine.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Integrating evolutionary genomics of forest trees to inform future tree breeding amid rapid climate change.Plant communications · 2024Review
- Genetic parameter changes and age-age correlations in Pinus koraiensis growth over 40-year progeny testing.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Genomic evaluation for breeding and genetic management in Cordia africana, a multipurpose tropical tree species.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Genomic dissection of additive and non-additive genetic effects and genomic prediction in an open-pollinated family test of Japanese larch.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Genomic selection for growth characteristics in Korean red pine (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Genomic selection in forest trees comes to life: unraveling its potential in an advanced four-generationFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenomic selection (GS) can increase genetic gain by reducing the length of breeding cycle in forest trees. Here we genotyped 1370 control-pollinated progeny trees from 128 full-sib families in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), using exome capture as genotyping platform. We used 116,765 high-quality SNPs to develop genomic prediction models for tree height and wood quality traits. We assessed the impact of different genomic prediction methods, genotype-by-environment interaction (G × E), genetic composition, size of the training and validation set, relatedness, and number of SNPs on accuracy and predictive ability (PA) of GS.
resultsUsing G matrix slightly altered heritability estimates relative to pedigree-based method. GS accuracies were about 11-14% lower than those based on pedigree-based selection. The efficiency of GS per year varied from 1.71 to 1.78, compared to that of the pedigree-based model if breeding cycle length was halved using GS. Height GS accuracy decreased to more than 30% while using one site as training for GS prediction and using this model to predict the second site, indicating that G × E for tree height should be accommodated in model fitting. Using a half-sib family structure instead of full-sib structure led to a significant reduction in GS accuracy and PA. The full-sib family structure needed only 750 markers to reach similar accuracy and PA, as compared to 100,000 markers required for the half-sib family, indicating that maintaining the high relatedness in the model improves accuracy and PA. Using 4000-8000 markers in full-sib family structure was sufficient to obtain GS model accuracy and PA for tree height and wood quality traits, almost equivalent to that obtained with all markers.
conclusionsThe study indicates that GS would be efficient in reducing generation time of breeding cycle in conifer tree breeding program that requires long-term progeny testing. The sufficient number of trees within-family (16 for growth and 12 for wood quality traits) and number of SNPs (8000) are required for GS with full-sib family relationship. GS methods had little impact on GS efficiency for growth and wood quality traits. GS model should incorporate G × E effect when a strong G × E is detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.