Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30563350›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of radiology2019

Rohan Nandurkar, Pimmeke van Leeuwen, Phillip Stricker, Henry Woo, Rajdeep Kooner, Carlo Yuen, Gordon O'Neill, David Ende, Thomas Cusick, Bao Ho and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Incremental Impact of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2022
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rohan Nandurkar1 Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales Sydney , Sydney, NSW , Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9763-5656
Pimmeke van Leeuwen2 Clinical Prostate Cancer Research, The Garvan Institute of Medical Research , Sydney, NSW , Australia.
Phillip Stricker2 Clinical Prostate Cancer Research, The Garvan Institute of Medical Research , Sydney, NSW , Australia.
Henry Woo5 Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital , Sydney, NSW , Australia.
Rajdeep Kooner4 Department of Urology, St Vincent's Clinic , Sydney, NSW , Australia.
Carlo Yuen4 Department of Urology, St Vincent's Clinic , Sydney, NSW , Australia.
Gordon O'Neill4 Department of Urology, St Vincent's Clinic , Sydney, NSW , Australia.
David Ende4 Department of Urology, St Vincent's Clinic , Sydney, NSW , Australia.
Thomas Cusick2 Clinical Prostate Cancer Research, The Garvan Institute of Medical Research , Sydney, NSW , Australia.
Bao Ho6 Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney , Sydney, NSW , Australia.
Adam Hickey6 Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney , Sydney, NSW , Australia.
Louise Emmett2 Clinical Prostate Cancer Research, The Garvan Institute of Medical Research , Sydney, NSW , Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methods: We analysed results of 142 males with staging PSMA prior to radical prostatectomy (RP). Data collected included PSMA PET/CT, bone scan (30/142), mpMRI (112/142), and pathological T stage (pT) stage, Gleason score, surgical margins and lymph node status at RP. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was documented at staging scan, and following surgery (median 45 days (interquartile range 38-59). A PSA of < 0.03 ng ml

results: 97.9% (139/142) of males had positive intraprostatic findings on PSMA. 14.1 % (20/142) of males had further sites of extra prostatic disease identified on PSMA PET. In males with disease confined to the prostate, 82.9 % (92/111) achieved an SR, compared to 28.6 % (4/14) in males with extraprostatic disease identified (lymph node positive and distant metastatic disease) (p < 0.001). On binary logistic regression PSMA had a superior predictive value for SR than Gleason score, PSA (at time of imaging) or pT stage. MRI was less sensitive and more specific for SVI, and less sensitive for nodal involvement.

conclusion: Extraprostatic disease identified on staging pre-operative PSMA PET is independently predictive of a poor surgical response to RP, and may indicate a need for a multimodality approach to treatment. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: This is one of the first studies to correlate the PSMA PET's staging capacity to prostate cancer patient's outcomes to radical prostatectomy and indicates it's potential in predicting which patients will benefit from radical prostatectomy.

Indexed as

AgedEdetic AcidGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingOligopeptidesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPredictive Value of TestsProstateProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesEdetic Acidgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptides

Identifiers

PMID30563350
PMCPMC6541197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.