Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30563193›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

A Prenatal DHA Test to Help Identify Women at Increased Risk for Early Preterm Birth: A Proposal.

Kristina H Jackson, William S Harris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. DHA supplementation and pregnancy complications.Journal of translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristina H JacksonOmegaQuant, LLC, 5009 W. 12th St., Suite 8, Sioux Falls, SD 57106, USA. kristina@omegaquant.com.
William S HarrisOmegaQuant, LLC, 5009 W. 12th St., Suite 8, Sioux Falls, SD 57106, USA. bill@omegaquant.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3042-9353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish intake and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), a nutrient found in fish, have been favorably linked to several pregnancy outcomes. The risk of early preterm birth (ePT, <34 weeks gestation) is associated with low fish intake and DHA blood levels and can be reduced by supplemental DHA. Here, we summarize the evidence linking blood DHA levels with risk for ePT birth, and based on the available studies, propose that women who are pregnant or trying to become pregnant aim for a red blood cell (RBC) DHA value of at least 5% (of total RBC fatty acids). In the US, ~70% of women of childbearing age are likely below this cut-point, and dietary intake data suggest that this group, including pregnant women, consumes ~60 mg/day DHA and that >90% of this group do not take an omega-3 supplement. Since the recommendations for women to consume fish and to take a 200 mg DHA supplement during pregnancy are not being heeded generally, there is a need to motivate practitioners and pregnant women to attend to these recommendations. Having an objective prenatal blood DHA test could provide such motivation. More research is needed to test the clinical utility of this proposed target prenatal DHA level.

Indexed as

DietDietary SupplementsPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthPrenatal CareAdultAnimalsBlood Chemical AnalysisDietary Fats, UnsaturatedDocosahexaenoic AcidsErythrocytesFatty Acids, Omega-3FemaleFishesGestational AgeHumansDietary Fats, UnsaturatedDocosahexaenoic AcidsFatty Acids, Omega-3DHAomega-3 fatty acidspregnancypreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID30563193
PMCPMC6316227
OpenAlexW2902698295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.