Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30563038›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Evaluation of Three Morphologically Distinct Virus-Like Particles as Nanocarriers for Convection-Enhanced Drug Delivery to Glioblastoma.

Joel A Finbloom, Ioana L Aanei, Jenna M Bernard, Sarah H Klass, Susanna K Elledge, Kenneth Han, Tomoko Ozawa, Theodore P Nicolaides, Mitchel S Berger, Matthew B Francis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Nanotherapy of Glioblastoma-Where Hope Grows.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emerging Perspectives on Prime Editor Delivery to the Brain.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joel A FinbloomDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. jaf@berkeley.edu.
Ioana L AaneiDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. aanei.ioana@gmail.com.
Jenna M BernardDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. bernarje@gmail.com.
Sarah H KlassDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. sklass@berkeley.edu.
Susanna K ElledgeDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. susannaelle@berkeley.edu.
Kenneth HanDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. kennethhan@berkeley.edu.
Tomoko OzawaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. tomoko.ozawa@ucsf.edu.
Theodore P NicolaidesDepartment of Pediatrics, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA. Theodore.nicolaides@nyumc.org.
Mitchel S BergerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Mitchel.Berger@ucsf.edu.
Matthew B FrancisDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. mbfrancis@berkeley.edu.

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-11-C-0028Hana Jabsheh Fund UCSF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is a particularly challenging cancer, as there are currently limited options for treatment. New delivery routes are being explored, including direct intratumoral injection via convection-enhanced delivery (CED). While promising, convection-enhanced delivery of traditional chemotherapeutics such as doxorubicin (DOX) has seen limited success. Several studies have demonstrated that attaching a drug to polymeric nanoscale materials can improve drug delivery efficacy via CED. We therefore set out to evaluate a panel of morphologically distinct protein nanoparticles for their potential as CED drug delivery vehicles for glioblastoma treatment. The panel consisted of three different virus-like particles (VLPs), MS2 spheres, tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) disks and nanophage filamentous rods modified with DOX. While all three VLPs displayed adequate drug delivery and cell uptake in vitro, increased survival rates were only observed for glioma-bearing mice that were treated via CED with TMV disks and MS2 spheres conjugated to doxorubicin, with TMV-treated mice showing the best response. Importantly, these improved survival rates were observed after only a single VLP⁻DOX CED injection several orders of magnitude smaller than traditional IV doses. Overall, this study underscores the potential of nanoscale chemotherapeutic CED using virus-like particles and illustrates the need for further studies into how the overall morphology of VLPs influences their drug delivery properties.

Indexed as

bioconjugationconvection-enhanced deliverydoxorubicindrug deliveryglioblastomaprotein-based nanomaterialstobacco mosaic virusviral capsidvirus-like particles

Identifiers

PMID30563038
PMCPMC6315496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.