Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30563026›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

A Preemptive Priority-Based Data Fragmentation Scheme for Heterogeneous Traffic in Wireless Sensor Networks.

Anwar Ahmed Khan, Sayeed Ghani, Shama Siddiqui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anwar Ahmed KhanFaculty of Computer Science, Institute of Business Administration, Karachi 74400, Pakistan. yrawna@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2237-5124
Sayeed GhaniFaculty of Computer Science, Institute of Business Administration, Karachi 74400, Pakistan. sghani@iba.edu.pk.ORCID 0000-0003-2938-2789
Shama SiddiquiDepartment of Computer Science, DHA Suffa University, Karachi 75500, Pakistan. shamasid@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3547-0307

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prioritizing the heterogeneous traffic for Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) imposes an important performance challenge for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. Most past preemptive MAC schemes are based on scheduling the high priority packets earlier than those of lower priority. However, in a majority of these schemes, high priority traffic must wait for the ongoing transmission of lower priority traffic due to the non-availability of an interruption mechanism. This paper presents the design and high-level implementation details of a fragmentation scheme (FROG-MAC) for heterogeneous traffic in WSN. FROG-MAC aims at guaranteeing quick transmission of high priority/emergency traffic by interrupting ongoing on channel transmissions. High level implementation of FROG-MAC has been developed in MATLAB as a proof of concept. Traffic of two priorities was generated and a single hop star topology of 100 nodes was used for the experiments. Effect of the proposed fragmentation scheme has been evaluated on delay and Packet Drop Ratio (PDR) for both traffic types, by varying the packet size and fragment size. Simulation results have suggested that with the increasing packet size, the delay and PDR increase for both traffic types. When fragmentation was applied, the performance of high priority traffic significantly improved as compared to the low priority for both the parameters, delay and PDR. Furthermore, it has been found that decreasing the fragment size for low priority traffic results in reducing the delay for high priority traffic.

Indexed as

fragmentationFROG-MACheterogeneousIoTpriority

Identifiers

PMID30563026
PMCPMC6308628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.