ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2018
Coronary Vasculature in Cardiac Development and Regeneration.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative circulatory engineering for regenerative therapy: Dynamic perfusion design and metabolic maturation in cardiac tissue engineering.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Animal models to study cardiac regeneration.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Type II single coronary artery from right aortic sinus, retro-aortic left coronary artery and dual LAD: a rare association of coronary arterial variations.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2023Article
- Zebrafish heart regeneration after coronary dysfunction-induced cardiac damage.Developmental biology · 2022Article
- The Zebrafish Cardiac Endothelial Cell-Roles in Development and Regeneration.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2021Review
- Derivation of proliferative islet1-positive cells during metamorphosis and wound response in Xenopus.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2021Article
- Coronary vessel formation in development and disease: mechanisms and insights for therapy.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2020Review
- Prokineticin signaling in heart-brain developmental axis: Therapeutic options for heart and brain injuries.Pharmacological research · 2020Review
- Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac stromal cells and their applications in regenerative medicine.Stem cell research · 2020Review
- Epicardium in Heart Development.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2020Review
- Coronary Revascularization During Heart Regeneration Is Regulated by Epicardial and Endocardial Cues and Forms a Scaffold for Cardiomyocyte Repopulation.Developmental cell · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Functional coronary circulation is essential for a healthy heart in warm-blooded vertebrates, and coronary diseases can have a fatal consequence. Despite the growing interest, the knowledge about the coronary vessel development and the roles of new coronary vessel formation during heart regeneration is still limited. It is demonstrated that early revascularization is required for efficient heart regeneration. In this comprehensive review, we first describe the coronary vessel formation from an evolutionary perspective. We further discuss the cell origins of coronary endothelial cells and perivascular cells and summarize the critical signaling pathways regulating coronary vessel development. Lastly, we focus on the current knowledge about the molecular mechanisms regulating heart regeneration in zebrafish, a genetically tractable vertebrate model with a regenerative adult heart and well-developed coronary system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.