Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30563000›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Methodology of Drought Stress Research: Experimental Setup and Physiological Characterization.

Natalia Osmolovskaya, Julia Shumilina, Ahyoung Kim, Anna Didio, Tatiana Grishina, Tatiana Bilova, Olga A Keltsieva, Vladimir Zhukov, Igor Tikhonovich, Elena Tarakhovskaya and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation and Selection ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antioxidant capacity and root KPlant cell reports · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Natalia OsmolovskayaDepartment of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia. natalia_osm@mail.ru.
Julia ShumilinaDepartment of Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199904 St. Petersburg, Russia. schumilina.u@yandex.ru.
Ahyoung KimDepartment of Bioorganic Chemistry, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany. ariyong1002@gmail.com.
Anna DidioDepartment of Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199904 St. Petersburg, Russia. didio1992@yandex.ru.
Tatiana GrishinaDepartment of Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199904 St. Petersburg, Russia. tgrishina@mail.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-5306-2980
Tatiana BilovaDepartment of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia. bilova.tatiana@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6024-3667
Olga A KeltsievaInstitute of Analytical Instrumentation, Russian Academy of Science, 190103 St. Petersburg, Russia. keltcieva@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4069-0355
Vladimir ZhukovAll-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, 196608 St. Petersburg, Russia. vladimir.zhukoff@gmail.com.
Igor TikhonovichAll-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, 196608 St. Petersburg, Russia. arriam2008@yandex.ru.
Elena TarakhovskayaDepartment of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia. elena.tarakhovskaya@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5341-2813
Andrej FrolovDepartment of Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199904 St. Petersburg, Russia. afrolov@ipb-halle.de.
Ludger A WessjohannDepartment of Bioorganic Chemistry, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany. wessjohann@ipb-halle.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2060-8235

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 17-16-01042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought is one of the major stress factors affecting the growth and development of plants. In this context, drought-related losses of crop plant productivity impede sustainable agriculture all over the world. In general, plants respond to water deficits by multiple physiological and metabolic adaptations at the molecular, cellular, and organism levels. To understand the underlying mechanisms of drought tolerance, adequate stress models and arrays of reliable stress markers are required. Therefore, in this review we comprehensively address currently available models of drought stress, based on culturing plants in soil, hydroponically, or in agar culture, and critically discuss advantages and limitations of each design. We also address the methodology of drought stress characterization and discuss it in the context of real experimental approaches. Further, we highlight the trends of methodological developments in drought stress research, i.e., complementing conventional tests with quantification of phytohormones and reactive oxygen species (ROS), measuring antioxidant enzyme activities, and comprehensively profiling transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsPlantsProteomeStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptomeDehydrationPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsProteomedrought modelsDrought stressdrought toleranceoxidative stressphytohormonespolyethylene glycol (PEG)stress markers

Identifiers

PMID30563000
PMCPMC6321153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.