Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30562999›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

The Public Health Responsibility Deal: Using a Systems-Level Analysis to Understand the Lack of Impact on Alcohol, Food, Physical Activity, and Workplace Health Sub-Systems.

Cécile Knai, Mark Petticrew, Nick Douglas, Mary Alison Durand, Elizabeth Eastmure, Ellen Nolte, Nicholas Mays

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Effectiveness of Partnerships With Commercial Actors to Improve Food Environments: A Systematic Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Reflections on implementing population-based measures for the prevention of non-communicable diseases].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cécile KnaiFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15⁻17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK. cecile.knai@lshtm.ac.uk.
Mark PetticrewFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15⁻17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK. mark.petticrew@lshtm.ac.uk.
Nick DouglasFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15⁻17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK. nick.douglas@lshtm.ac.uk.
Mary Alison DurandFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15⁻17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK. mary-alison.durand@lshtm.ac.uk.
Elizabeth EastmureFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15⁻17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK. elizabeth.eastmure@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6796-3707
Ellen NolteFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15⁻17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK. ellen.nolte@lshtm.ac.uk.
Nicholas MaysFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15⁻17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK. nicholas.mays@lshtm.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health 2010001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent to which government should partner with business interests such as the alcohol, food, and other industries in order to improve public health is a subject of ongoing debate. A common approach involves developing voluntary agreements with industry or allowing them to self-regulate. In England, the most recent example of this was the Public Health Responsibility Deal (RD), a public⁻private partnership launched in 2011 under the then Conservative-led coalition government. The RD was organised around a series of voluntary agreements that aim to bring together government, academic experts, and commercial, public sector and voluntary organisations to commit to pledges to undertake actions of public health benefit. This paper brings together the main findings and implications of the evaluation of the RD using a systems approach. We analysed the functioning of the RD exploring the causal pathways involved and how they helped or hindered the RD; the structures and processes; feedback loops and how they might have constrained or potentiated the effects of the RD; and how resilient the wider systems were to change (i.e., the alcohol, food, and other systems interacted with). Both the production and uptake of pledges by RD partners were largely driven by the interests of partners themselves, enabling these wider systems to resist change. This analysis demonstrates how and why the RD did not meet its objectives. The findings have lessons for the development of effective alcohol, food and other policies, for defining the role of unhealthy commodity industries, and for understanding the limits of industry self-regulation as a public health measure.

Indexed as

Alcoholic BeveragesExerciseOccupational HealthEnglandFood IndustryHealth PolicyHealth PromotionHealthy LifestyleHumansPublic HealthPublic-Private Sector PartnershipsSocial BehaviorSystems Analysisalcoholfoodphysical activitypublic-private partnershipsystems approachsystems thinkingworkplace health

Identifiers

PMID30562999
PMCPMC6313377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.