Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30562943›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2018

PCA-Based Multiple-Trait GWAS Analysis: A Powerful Model for Exploring Pleiotropy.

Wengang Zhang, Xue Gao, Xinping Shi, Bo Zhu, Zezhao Wang, Huijiang Gao, Lingyang Xu, Lupei Zhang, Junya Li, Yan Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multivariate Analysis and Modelling of multiple Brain endOphenotypes: Let's MAMBO!Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wengang ZhangCattle Genetics and Breeding Group, Institute of Animal Science (IAS), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China. zhangwengang_19@sina.com.
Xue GaoCattle Genetics and Breeding Group, Institute of Animal Science (IAS), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China. gaoxue76@126.com.
Xinping ShiCattle Genetics and Breeding Group, Institute of Animal Science (IAS), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China. sxp18811727129@163.com.
Bo ZhuCattle Genetics and Breeding Group, Institute of Animal Science (IAS), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China. zhubo525@126.com.
Zezhao WangCattle Genetics and Breeding Group, Institute of Animal Science (IAS), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China. wangzezhao1@163.com.
Huijiang GaoCattle Genetics and Breeding Group, Institute of Animal Science (IAS), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China. gaohj111@sina.com.
Lingyang XuCattle Genetics and Breeding Group, Institute of Animal Science (IAS), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China. xulingyang@caas.cn.
Lupei ZhangCattle Genetics and Breeding Group, Institute of Animal Science (IAS), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China. zhanglupei@caas.cn.
Junya LiCattle Genetics and Breeding Group, Institute of Animal Science (IAS), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China. lijunya@caas.cn.
Yan ChenCattle Genetics and Breeding Group, Institute of Animal Science (IAS), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China. chenyan0204@163.com.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNHebei Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Principal component analysis (PCA) is a potential approach that can be applied in multiple-trait genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to explore pleiotropy, as well as increase the power of quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection. In this study, the relationship of test single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was determined between single-trait GWAS and PCA-based GWAS. We found that the estimated pleiotropic quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs) β * ^ were in most cases larger than the single-trait model estimations ( β 1 ^ and β 2 ^ ). Analysis using the simulated data showed that PCA-based multiple-trait GWAS has improved statistical power for detecting QTL compared to single-trait GWAS. For the minor allele frequency (MAF), when the MAF of QTNs was greater than 0.2, the PCA-based model had a significant advantage in detecting the pleiotropic QTNs, but when its MAF was reduced from 0.2 to 0, the advantage began to disappear. In addition, as the linkage disequilibrium (LD) of the pleiotropic QTNs decreased, its detection ability declined in the co-localization effect model. Furthermore, on the real data of 1141 Simmental cattle, we applied the PCA model to the multiple-trait GWAS analysis and identified a QTL that was consistent with a candidate gene,

Indexed as

genome-wide association studyMCHR2multiple-traitpleiotropyprincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID30562943
PMCPMC6316348
OpenAlexW2904997562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.