Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30562368›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Effects of urbanization on the foraging ecology and microbiota of the generalist seabird Larus argentatus.

Matthew Fuirst, Richard R Veit, Megan Hahn, Nolwenn Dheilly, Lesley H Thorne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fin Whale (Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Gut Microbiome Variations in Herring Gulls (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Light at night: effect on the daily clock, learning, memory, cognition, and expression of transcripts in different brain regions of rat.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew FuirstSchool of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7488-4150
Richard R VeitDepartment of Biology, College of Staten Island (CSI) CUNY, Staten Island, NY, United States of America.
Megan HahnSchool of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.
Nolwenn DheillySchool of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3675-5013
Lesley H ThorneSchool of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.
Stony Brook University · USCollege of Staten Island · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Larus gull species have proven adaptable to urbanization and due to their generalist feeding behaviors, they provide useful opportunities to study how urban environments impact foraging behavior and host-associated microbiota. We evaluated how urbanization influenced the foraging behavior and microbiome characteristics of breeding herring gulls (Larus argentatus) at three different colonies on the east coast of the United States. Study colonies represented high, medium and low degrees of urbanization, respectively. At all colonies, gulls frequently foraged at landfills and in other urban environments, but both the use of urban environments and gull foraging metrics differed with the degree of urbanization. Gulls at the more urban colonies used urban environments more frequently, showed higher rates of site fidelity and took shorter trips. Gulls at less urban colonies used a greater diversity of habitat types and foraged offshore. We observed high microbial diversity at all colonies, though microbial diversity was highest at the least urban colony where gulls used a wider variety of foraging habitats. This suggests that gulls may acquire a wider range of bacteria when visiting a higher variety of foraging sites. Our findings highlight the influence of urban habitats on gull movements and microbiome composition and diversity during the breeding season and represent the first application of amplicon sequence variants, an objective and repeatable method of bacterial classification, to study the microbiota of a seabird species.

Indexed as

Appetitive BehaviorFeeding BehaviorUrbanizationAnimalsBiodiversityCharadriiformesDNA, BacterialEcological and Environmental PhenomenaHumansNew EnglandRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30562368
PMCPMC6298667
OpenAlexW2904073127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.