Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30562354›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Differential replication efficiencies between Japanese encephalitis virus genotype I and III in avian cultured cells and young domestic ducklings.

Changguang Xiao, Chenxi Li, Di Di, Julien Cappelle, Lihong Liu, Xin Wang, Linlin Pang, Jinpeng Xu, Ke Liu, Beibei Li and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Australian vertebrate hosts of Japanese encephalitis virus: a review of the evidence.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Detection of Japanese encephalitis virus inParasite epidemiology and control · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Changguang XiaoDepartment of Swine Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai, PR China.
Chenxi LiDepartment of Swine Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai, PR China.
Di DiDepartment of Swine Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai, PR China.
Julien CappelleASTRE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier, France.
Lihong LiuDepartment of Virology, Immunobiology and Parasitology (VIP), The National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Xin WangDepartment of Swine Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai, PR China.
Linlin PangDepartment of Swine Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai, PR China.
Jinpeng XuDepartment of Swine Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai, PR China.
Ke LiuDepartment of Swine Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai, PR China.
Beibei LiDepartment of Swine Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai, PR China.
Donghua ShaoDepartment of Swine Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai, PR China.
Yafeng QiuDepartment of Swine Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai, PR China.
Weijie RenNational Diagnostic Center for Exotic Animal Diseases, China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, PR China.
Frederik WidénDepartment of Virology, Immunobiology and Parasitology (VIP), The National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Véronique ChevalierASTRE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier, France.
Jianchao WeiDepartment of Swine Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai, PR China.
Xiaodong WuNational Diagnostic Center for Exotic Animal Diseases, China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, PR China.
Zhiyong MaDepartment of Swine Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai, PR China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNShanghai Veterinary Research Institute · CNChina Animal Health and Epidemiology Center · CNSwedish Veterinary Agency · SEAnimal, Santé, Territoires, Risques et Ecosystèmes · FRCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) genotype dominance has shifted to genotype I (GI) from genotype III (GIII) in China as demonstrated by molecular epidemiological surveillance. In this study, we performed a serological survey in JEV-non-vaccinated pigs to confirm JEV genotype shift at the sero-epidemiological level. The average ratio of GI/GIII infection was 1.87, suggesting co-circulation of GI and GIII infections with GI infection being more prevalent in pigs in China. To gain an insight into the reasons for this JEV genotype shift, the replication kinetics of seven recently-isolated JEV isolates including three GI strains and four GIII strains were compared in mosquito C6/36 cells, chicken fibroblast cells (DF-1) and porcine iliac artery endothelial cells (PIEC). We observed that GI strains replicated more efficiently than GIII strains in DF-1 and PIEC cells, particularly in DF-1 cells with titers reaching 22.9-225.3 fold higher than GIII strains. This shows an enhanced replication efficiency of GI viruses in avian cells. To examine this enhanced replication efficiency in vivo, young domestic ducklings were used as the animal model and inoculated with GI and GIII strains at day 2 post-hatching. We observed that GI-inoculated ducklings developed higher viremia titers and displayed a comparatively longer viremic duration than GIII-inoculated ducklings. These results conform to the hypothesis of an enhanced replication efficiency for GI viruses in birds. There are 36 amino acid differences between GI and GIII viruses, some of which may be responsible for the enhanced replication efficiency of GI viruses in birds. Based on these findings, we speculated that the enhanced replication of GI viruses in birds would have resulted in higher exposure and therefore infection in mosquitoes, which could result in an increased transmission efficiency of GI viruses in the birds-mosquitoes-birds enzootic transmission cycle, thereby contributing to JEV genotype shift.

Indexed as

Virus ReplicationAnimalsCell LineChickensCulicidaeDucksEncephalitis, JapaneseEncephalitis Virus, JapaneseGenotypeHumansPhylogenySwineVirus Cultivation

Identifiers

PMID30562354
PMCPMC6314627
OpenAlexW2905473591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.