Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30561901›Full record

ReviewMolecular oncology2019

Late translational research: putting forward a new model for developing new anti-cancer treatments that addresses the needs of patients and society.

Denis Lacombe, Jan Bogaerts, Bertrand Tombal, François Maignen, Leeza Osipienko, Richard Sullivan, Vassilis Golfinopoulos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Denis LacombeEORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Jan BogaertsEORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Bertrand TombalCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Université Catholique de Louvain Brussels, Belgium.
François MaignenNICE Scientific Advice, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.
Leeza OsipienkoNICE Scientific Advice, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.
Richard SullivanInstitute of Cancer Policy, Conflict and Health Research Group, King's College London & Kings Health Partners Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK.
Vassilis GolfinopoulosEORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bringing therapeutic innovation and the latest science to routine patient care, while safeguarding principles of affordability and equality, is a challenging mission in the current complex multi-stakeholder environment. Precision oncology and new approaches to clinical trials (methods and clinical setting) have dramatically changed clinical research and the clinical development of new treatments. Improved understanding of molecular biology and immunology paves the way for innovative pharmacological approaches. However, we argue that the evidence generated during the clinical development of these new products for the purpose of obtaining marketing authorisations often does not address fundamental questions concerning the impact of these new interventions on the most relevant clinical outcomes: namely, quality of life and patient survival. Similarly, patient populations (for example defined by biomarkers), treatment duration, and sequence and combination of treatments within current treatment pathways are often poorly defined by clinical developments for regulatory purposes. Finally, the lack of integrated translational research within the pathway of development is a major limiting factor to delivering cost-effective and affordable, evidence-based care to clinical practice. This leaves many gaps in the knowledge on the efficacy and therapeutic use of medicines, which can impose a significant financial burden on healthcare systems, possibly to the detriment of more cost-effective interventions. We argue that policy changes are required to integrate clinical research and healthcare to inform clinical practice. New routes toward optimising the integration of drug development and care are being proposed to achieve this ultimate goal.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandModels, TheoreticalSocial ChangeTranslational Research, BiomedicalClinical Trials as TopicHumansNeoplasmscancer clinical researcheffectivenesshealthcarepatient centrednesstranslational research

Identifiers

PMID30561901
PMCPMC6396352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.