ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2019
Impaired forward model updating in young adults with Tourette syndrome.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sense of agency and its disturbances: A systematic review targeting the intentional binding effect in neuropsychiatric disorders.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2024Pooled it
- Autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder traits as predictors of tic phenomenology in children and adolescents.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
- The Transdiagnostic Relevance of Self-Other Distinction to Psychiatry Spans Emotional, Cognitive and Motor Domains.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Towards an Ideology-Free, Truly Mechanistic Health Psychology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Distinct Brain-Oscillatory Neuroanatomical Architecture of Perception-Action Integration in Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2021Article
- Increased scale-free and aperiodic neural activity during sensorimotor integration-a novel facet in Tourette syndrome.Brain communications · 2021Article
- Altered sense of agency in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome: behavioural, clinical and functional magnetic resonance imaging findings.Brain communications · 2020Article
- Forward model deficits and enhanced motor noise in Tourette syndrome?Brain : a journal of neurology · 2019Article
- Generating truth from error: insights from neurodevelopmental disorders.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current theories of motor control emphasize how the brain may use internal models of the body to ensure accurate planning and control of movements. One such internal model-a forward model-is thought to generate an estimate of the next motor state and/or the sensory consequences of an upcoming movement, thereby allowing movement errors to be monitored. In addition, forward models may provide a means by which to determine a sense of agency, i.e. the (conscious) sense of authorship and control over our actions. Tourette syndrome is a developmental neurological condition characterized by the occurrence of motor and phonic tics. The involuntary (or voluntary) nature of tics has been the subject of considerable debate, and it was recently argued that the presence of tics in Tourette syndrome could result in a blurring of any subjective boundary between voluntary and involuntary movements. In particular, it was proposed that the level of sensorimotor noise that accompanies tics may be particularly high in Tourette syndrome, and this may contribute to less efficient forward models used to determine agency. We investigated whether the internal monitoring of movements is impaired in individuals with Tourette syndrome, relative to a matched group of typically developing individuals, using a task that involved executing double-step aiming movements using a hand-held robot manipulandum. Participants were required on each trial to execute two movements in turn, each directed to a remembered target location without visual feedback. Importantly, we assumed that to perform accurately on the second (return) movement it would be necessary to update any forward model to take into account errors made during the first (outward) movement. Here we demonstrate that while the Tourette syndrome group were equally accurate, and no more variable, than the matched control group in executing aiming movements to the first (outward) target location, they were significantly less accurate, and exhibited greater movement variability, than controls when executing the second (return) movement. Furthermore, we show that for the return movement only, movement accuracy and movement variability were significantly predicted by the Tourette syndrome group's clinical severity scores. We interpret these findings as consistent with the view that individuals with Tourette syndrome may experience a reduction in the precision of the forward model estimates thought necessary for the accurate planning and control of movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30561518What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.