Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30561404›Full record

ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2018

Development and usefulness of the new endoscopic classification: DICA.

Ginevra Cambiè, Alessandra Violi, Chiara Miraglia, Alberto Barchi, Antonio Nouvenne, Mario Capasso, Gioacchino Leandro, Tiziana Meschi, Gian Luigi De' Angelis, Francesco Di Mario

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ginevra CambièDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy. ginevra.cambie@gmail.com.
Alessandra Violi
Chiara Miraglia
Alberto Barchi
Antonio Nouvenne
Mario Capasso
Gioacchino Leandro
Tiziana Meschi
Gian Luigi De' Angelis
Francesco Di Mario

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonic Diverticulosis is one of the most common anatomical findings during colonoscopy. This condition has 60% incidence in the population over 60 years old. About 20% of patients will develop Diverticular Disease, and 5% of them will evolve into Diverticulitis. Until the last years there weren't any approaches for the endoscopic classification of this pathology. In 2013, in Florence, the first endoscopic classification was developed: DICA (Diverticular Inflammation and Complication Assessment). The aim of this article is to focus on the process of the development and the validation of the classification by the pool of gastroenterology experts, and, as well, its usefulness during the clinical practice.

Indexed as

ColonoscopySeverity of Illness IndexConstriction, PathologicDiverticulitisDiverticulosis, ColonicGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansSymptom Assessment

Identifiers

PMID30561404
PMCPMC6502187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.