Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30561271›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Prevalence and Clinical Factors of Migraine in Patients With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.

Susan N Kok, Sharonne N Hayes, F Michael Cutrer, Claire E Raphael, Rajiv Gulati, Patricia J M Best, Marysia S Tweet

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01427179 recruitingnot on this map

Genetic Investigations in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMayo ClinicRan2011 to 2030Enrolled2,000ConditionsSpontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection, SCAD
NCT01429727 recruitingnot on this map

The "Virtual" Multicenter Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) Registry

TypeobservationalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2011 to 2030Enrolled2,500ConditionsSpontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection, SCAD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Women.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Spontaneous Coronary Dissection Review: A Complex Picture.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susan N Kok1 Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Medicine Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science Rochester MN.
Sharonne N Hayes2 Department of Cardiovascular Diseases Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science Rochester MN.
F Michael Cutrer3 Department of Neurology Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science Rochester MN.
Claire E Raphael4 Dorset Heart Center Royal Bournemouth Hospital Bournemouth United Kingdom.
Rajiv Gulati2 Department of Cardiovascular Diseases Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science Rochester MN.
Patricia J M Best2 Department of Cardiovascular Diseases Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science Rochester MN.
Marysia S Tweet2 Department of Cardiovascular Diseases Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science Rochester MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a cause of acute coronary syndrome predominantly in women without usual cardiovascular risk factors. Many have a history of migraine headaches, but this association is poorly understood. This study aimed to determine migraine prevalence among SCAD patients and assess differences in clinical factors based on migraine history. Methods and Results A cohort study was conducted using the Mayo Clinic SCAD "Virtual" Multi-Center Registry composed of patients with SCAD as confirmed on coronary angiography. Participant-provided data and records were reviewed for migraine history, risk factors, SCAD details, therapies, and outcomes. Among 585 patients (96% women), 236 had migraine history; the lifetime and 1-year prevalence of migraine were 40% and 26%, respectively. Migraine was more common in SCAD women than comparable literature-reported female populations (42% versus 24%, P<0.0001; 42% versus 33%, P<0.0001). Among all SCAD patients, those with migraine history were more likely to be female (99.6% versus 94%; P=0.0002); have SCAD at a younger age (45.2±9.0 years versus 47.6±9.9 years; P=0.0027); have depression (27% versus 17%; P=0.025); have recurrent post-SCAD chest pain at 1 month (50% versus 39%; P=0.035); and, among those assessed, have aneurysms, pseudoaneurysms, or dissections (28% versus 18%; P=0.018). There was no difference in recurrent SCAD at 5 years for those with versus without migraine (15% versus 19%; P=0.39). Conclusions Many SCAD patients have a history of migraine. SCAD patients with migraine are younger at the time of SCAD; have more aneurysms, pseudoaneurysms, and dissections among those imaged; and more often report a history of depression and post-SCAD chest pain. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT01429727, NCT01427179.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge of OnsetAngina PectorisChildCoronary Vessel AnomaliesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersPrevalenceRegistriesRisk Factorscardiovascular diseasedissectionmigrainemyocardial infarctionwomen

Identifiers

PMID30561271
PMCPMC6405609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.