Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30561251›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Improved Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance With CODE ACES

Elizabeth A Hunt, Justin Jeffers, LeAnn McNamara, Heather Newton, Kenneth Ford, Meghan Bernier, Elizabeth W Tucker, Kareen Jones, Caitlin O'Brien, Pamela Dodge and 6 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Data-driven resuscitation training using pose estimation.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Elizabeth A Hunt1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
Justin Jeffers2 Department of Pediatrics Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
LeAnn McNamara6 Department of Pharmacy Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
Heather Newton7 Department of Occupational Health Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
Kenneth Ford7 Department of Occupational Health Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
Meghan Bernier1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
Elizabeth W Tucker1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
Kareen Jones1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
Caitlin O'Brien1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
Pamela Dodge8 Department of Nursing Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
Sarah Vanderwagen8 Department of Nursing Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
Cheryl Salamone9 Division of Respiratory Services Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
Tamara Pegram8 Department of Nursing Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
Michael Rosen1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.
Heather M Griffis13 Healthcare Analytics Unit Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia PA.
Jordan Duval-Arnould1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Over 6000 children have an in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States annually. Most will not survive to discharge, with significant variability in survival across hospitals suggesting improvement in resuscitation performance can save lives. Methods and Results A prospective observational study of quality of chest compressions ( CC ) during pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest associated with development and implementation of a resuscitation quality bundle. Objectives were to: 1) implement a debriefing program, 2) identify impediments to delivering high quality CC , 3) develop a resuscitation quality bundle, and 4) measure the impact of the resuscitation quality bundle on compliance with American Heart Association ( AHA ) Pediatric Advanced Life Support CC guidelines over time. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between compliance and year of event, adjusting for age and weight. Over 3 years, 317 consecutive cardiac arrests were debriefed, 38% (119/317) had CC data captured via defibrillator-based accelerometer pads, data capture increasing over time: (2013:13% [12/92] versus 2014:43% [44/102] versus 2015:51% [63/123], P<0.001). There were 2135 1-minute cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) epoch data available for analysis, (2013:152 versus 2014:922 versus 2015:1061, P<0.001). Performance mitigating themes were identified and evolved into the resuscitation quality bundle entitled CPR Coaching, Objective-Data Evaluation, Action-linked-phrases, Choreography, Ergonomics, Structured debriefing and Simulation (CODE ACES

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsCardiopulmonary ResuscitationChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGuideline AdherenceHeart ArrestHospital MortalityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInpatientsMalePatient Care BundlesPractice Guidelines as Topiccardiopulmonary arrestcardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)emergency cardiac carepediatricsquality and outcomesquality improvementsudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID30561251
PMCPMC6405605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.